People are posting wiki articles with non existent “sources” as proof the soviets were going to join the axis and helped the Nazis.

  • DankZedong
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 years ago

    That OP is posting this on dozens of subs, has regular anti-communist posts and comments. You’d think he’s be classified as a biohazard the way he’s glowing.

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Also like 2 of them are even smiling, pretty sad “celebration”. Looks to me like on both sides even ordinary troopers knew they are enemies with eachother.

    While for example, this happened while Soviets and Americans met, when both side soldiers genuinly considered themselves allies:

    • ☭CommieWolf☆
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      3 years ago

      Seeing the Soviet and US soldiers celebrating together makes me sad, in another world we could have all been comrades…

      • redtea
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        3 years ago

        That’s probably why the US went so hard during the cold war. They had to disrupt any notion of solidarity whatsoever.

          • redtea
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            3 years ago

            Just imagine how far the ruling class would get if westerners had been allowed to see Iraqis, Afghans, Libyans, Syrians, Palestinians, Russians, and even Ukrainians as fully human and as fundamentally peaceful as anyone else. Not very far at all, I’d wager.

              • redtea
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                3 years ago

                I see that but if they had been allowed, material conditions would have been different…

                Edit: just to clarify this because it might seem that I was doubling down, which was not my intention. I meant that for westerners to have been taught and allowed to humanise people they have been taught to other, it would mean that the material conditions were already changed. I did not mean that material conditions would have changed just because e.g. westerners were allowed to develop their own views without those views being influenced by propaganda. @TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmygrad.ml, you’re extremely right to point out that westerners simply thinking differently would not alter the contradictions that lead capitalists into endless wars.

      • JucheBot1988
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 years ago

        A world where we’d be shitposting American flags and pictures of William Z. Foster

    • JucheBot1988
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 years ago

      Gonna go ahead and say it, the Molotov-Ribbentropp pact was unironically a good thing given the circumstances (Britain and France both refusing to enter into an anti-fascist alliance with the USSR). A master stroke of diplomacy that forstalled the inevitable and gave the Soviet Union time to develop and arm.

      It also let the Soviet Union take back territory that had been stolen during the Polish-Soviet war and save a big chunk of Poland from Nazi rule.

      • Anarcho-Bolshevik
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 years ago

        I prefer to think of it as a necessary evil rather than a good thing, but I understand what you mean. Another outcome was that it allowed the Soviets to focus on resisting and weakening Japanese Imperialism, which I almost never see anticommunists mention (let alone discuss).

        An anticommunist would probably reply to you saying that the Soviets went in deporting and exterminating millions of peaceful civilians who were simply minding their own business or, at worst, politely expressing their disagreements with Joseph Stalin’s government.

      • OrnluWolfjarl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 years ago

        That’s what I tell people too, if Molotov-Ribbentropp wasn’t signed, the Nazis wouldn’t have lost.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Most likely. Look at the timetable of Barbarossa and Soviet retreat and mobilisation effort. If Germans started from the 1939 former Polish-USSR borders (and if independent Baltics let them through, which they would most likely did) Leningrad would fall for sure and Moscow and Stalingard most probably.

      • quality_funBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 years ago

        It also let the Soviet Union take back territory that had been stolen during the Polish-Soviet war and save a big chunk of Poland from Nazi rule.

        could you say more on this?

        • JucheBot1988
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 years ago

          During the Polish-Soviet war of 1919-1921 – Polish revanchists trying to remake the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth – Poland annexed parts of Ukraine and Belarus that it had controlled prior to 1772. The Peace of Riga formalized this. The Soviet Union took back these territories in the 1939 “invasion.”

          • quality_funBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            i was always critical of the ussr invading poland alongside germany. at least there’s more nuance to it.

            • Muad'DibberA
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 years ago

              There’s also the issue of not letting the nazis take undefended territory. Western pacifism has somehow brainwashed people into thinking that it would’ve been more ethical for the USSR to cede all these territories to the nazis in order to keep the “moral highground”, and not be called an aggressor. Years of the nazi’s scorched earth policy in eastern europe show how wrong that is.

  • Franfran2424
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 years ago

    When even r/europe locks your psot, you know you have gone extra fascist

  • JucheBot1988
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 years ago

    And yet Mihailovic, the arch-collaborator, is an anti-communist “hero”

    • Anarcho-Bolshevik
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 years ago

      Don’t forget the Finnish forces! Trolling anticommunists into justifying Finnish collaboration with the Axis is ridiculously easy, and forces them to relinquish their ‘both sides were equally bad’ façade by essentially admitting that the Third Reich was ‘the lesser evil’.

      • JucheBot1988
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 years ago

        That people see him as a hero is so weird. Maybe I’m missing something, but the only argument I’d ever heard in his favor that’s remotely plausible is, “sure, plenty of chetniks collaborated with the Ustase, but Mihailovic had nothing to do with it.” Which basically boils down to “he wasn’t a traitor, just a supremely incompentent general who couldn’t control his own troops.”

        Is that really somebody to lionize?

        • Shrike502
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 years ago

          sure, plenty of chetniks collaborated with the Ustase, but Mihailovic had nothing to do with it.

          Ya know, I’ve heard the same said about Bandera and OUN back in 2022

          • JucheBot1988
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 years ago

            Liberal heroes: genocidal maniacs at worst, total losers at best.

  • Burgereoisie
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 years ago

    How come Europeans never complain about the Soviets and British teaming up to invade Iran, an officially neutral nation?

    • Shrike502
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 years ago

      I’d be surprised if they know it happened. Otherwise, well, I think we both know why

  • Mzuark
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 years ago

    That could be a picture of a LARP and no one would know the difference. Also, I like how all mention of the Soviets stops in 1939 now. Not a word about the Nazis breaking the non-aggression pact and then comitting a genocide.

    • Anatolianin
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      It’s even funnier that it all starts in 1939, too. The USSR certainly did not fight the nazis in Spain and did not try to make an alliance with UK and France against the same nazis, nooo.

  • Lil Kitai
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 years ago

    Europoids are more sympathetic to one of these… and it sure isn’t the Soviets.