• @201dberg
    link
    421 year ago

    Libs literally cannot think in any way other than money is everything. People don’t fight wars, money does. People don’t solve problems, money does. People don’t provide labor, money does. They cannot fathom a world in which whoever throws the most money at a problem wins by default.

    • @sinovictorchan
      link
      19
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The focus on unsustainable consumption of resource rather than efficient management of resource is the reasons why the Pax Americana depends on countries that gain free riding from colonialism, free riding from the Bretton Woods institutions that funds corrupt governments in former European colonies, enslavement of First Nation children of North America in Residential fake Schools even after the end of the Cold War, inheritance thief of the murdered children of First Nation landowners in fake schools through fraudulent activities, continued imprisonment of First Nation people in planned poverty in concentration camps as a condition to maintain their property rights and “free” reparation money, and the dependency on extreme wealth concentration into the uncompetitive 1% oligarch. Liberal principle stress management of resource over unsustainable resource extraction, but the Liberals do not follow this principle in practice since they complained that it is “too unrealistic” and too “Communist”.

    • @supersolid_snake
      link
      161 year ago

      Capitalist thinking when it comes to their defense buddies: throw money at it

      Capitalist thinking when it comes to solving homelessness: let them freeze

    • @lxvi
      link
      141 year ago

      But I spent a thousand times more for it. Are you telling me it isn’t a thousand times better?

  • KiG V2
    link
    271 year ago

    I just don’t understand how they can still think that Russia is the bad guy and USA is the good guy.

    I guess it’s just some vague idea that the East is full of bloodthirsty backwards savages who don’t have any sense. I guess after all they did somehow make farmers with AKs in the Middle East into somehow a threat to a world-spanning Empire. I want to squish my eyeballs.

    • @pgtl_10
      link
      171 year ago

      From my experience, a lot of those “farmers” in the middle east tend to be quite educated.

      • KiG V2
        link
        151 year ago

        On one hand I was thinking of Mujahideen which I don’t associate with developed communities. But on the other hand I really don’t know what it’s really like 90% of the time and I’m probably still casually affected by the racist/Orientalist imperial mindset of the order I supposedly stand against. The brainwashing goes deep 🤷‍♂️

    • @ProleEntelechy
      link
      151 year ago

      I mean, isn’t Russia the “bad guy” because they invaded a sovereign nation. Doesn’t that also make the US a bad guy because sovereignty means nothing to them.

        • QueerCommie
          link
          161 year ago

          For being such big fans of lesser-evilism, they sure can’t understand critical support

        • @cayde6ml
          link
          91 year ago

          I’d argue that Russia is the “good guy” here for wanting to protect their people from Ukranazis.

      • @aleshasmiles
        link
        21 year ago

        U.S./NATO intentionally blur the lines of what constitutes sovereignty by having semi-colonized countries act effectively as vassal states while still upholding their independence on a merely superficial level.

  • Drstrange2love
    link
    261 year ago

    liberal discovering that military spending does not correspond to efficiency and results.

  • JoeMarx 193
    link
    251 year ago

    libs use brains

    First time this shit isn’t an oxymoron

  • @ComradeChairmanKGB
    link
    201 year ago

    American military spending sure sounds impressive. Just ignore the 10000% markups.

    • ButtigiegMineralMap
      link
      161 year ago

      And ignore the fact that many of the planes have serious design flaws despite costing millions to produce. Also please ignore the fact that they aren’t even used most of the time and just collect dust in a top of the line hanger

  • @darkcalling
    link
    161 year ago

    This is just moving the goal-posts thinking. They’ve gone from Ukraine will win/Ukraine will be in Moscow in two months to… well if the Russians don’t crush them in a few months they’re in trouble haha.

  • @HaSch
    link
    151 year ago

    You don’t sell good fences if your main business is lockpicking

  • @jlyws123
    link
    151 year ago

    Wait, how much did they give Ukraine?

    • @knfrmity
      link
      291 year ago

      Up to the middle of January 2023 the US has lent Ukraine $47B, which excludes the value of the weapons and equipment provided.

      I put emphasis on the lending part because this isn’t a giveaway. It’s lend-lease for the 21st century. Ukraine is and will be forced to sell off whatever means of production it still has left after this war to US capitalists in a desperate effort to pay this money back. Back in the WWII era lend-lease was used by the Americans to take over from the British as global hegemon and bring capitalist Europe under its wing.