• 18 Posts
  • 2.32K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 23rd, 2022

help-circle

  • I’m curious as to how you see Hudson’s Superimperialism as an explanation and confirmation of MMT, rather than (as I have understood it) a negation (and furthermore how you interpret it as a Marxian/Marxist theory).

    While MMT could theoretically work in a vacuum, was you’ve illustrated, I’ve come to understand the balance of payments issue absolutely critical to its stable functioning. International payments cannot be balanced vis a vis trading partners when a country continues creating money, even if such creation is balanced internally (or have I gotten this completely wrong?). That’s why I argue that MMT only “works” when applied to the USD, as it’s the only currency exempt from typical balance of payments considerations.


  • knfrmitytoThoughts on ...?Thoughts on Modern Monetary Theory?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s a nominally liberal smokescreen to explain why the US can do whatever it wants with the dollar without discussing imperialism or the US’ chokehold on global financial institutions.

    MMT only works when applied to USD based on the extraordinary privilege of being the hegemonic global reserve currency. Any other country will inevitably encounter inflation issues, primarily due to currency devaluation on foreign exchange markets. In fact all instances of hyperinflation have been due to excessive money creation, albeit under extenuating circumstances, typically oppressive foreign debt.

    With the accelerating trend of dedollarization, the USD will soon behave like all other currencies, beholden to a nation’s balance of payments.




  • knfrmitytoWorld NewsIRAN HAS JUST RESPONDED
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    … it’s part of why every country on earth […] has been very “No nukes! Not for any purpose!” all throughout until today. Like everyone understands it’s doomsday shit.

    Everyone except the arch-ghoul Kissinger and his merry band of war criminals. IIRC his initial political rise had to do with the book he wrote about “tactical” nukes. His thesis was something like, “ok, maybe big nukes are bad, but we can use little ones. As a treat”.




  • knfrmitytoGenZedongFrench hypocrisy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 days ago

    A nominally leftist party (probably actually socdems) won the French elections at one point, maybe in the 70s. They got to work raising taxes on capitalists and their means of production. It took about two years before they rolled it back cause the capitalists just said “oh alright, we’ll just leave and take our money with us then.”











  • I’ve usually gone for sci-fi lately, sometimes fantasy. I really really really enjoyed Becky Chambers’ Wayfarers series (they’re so cozy!). Recently finished Tchaikovsky’s Children of Time which was really interesting. When I’m in the mood for fantasy I’ve been working my way through Fionavar (super weird narrative style though) and Shannara. I can also highly recommend In the Name of the People, a Chinese political drama.