I remember reading from a Xinhua article a long time ago (I think roughly a year or more) that China’s non-interference policy isn’t permanent, and that one day they will begin to strike back and truly stand up against the U.S. empire, and that time was approaching. But it probably won’t be for years, at best.
I remember reading from a Xinhua article a long time ago (I think roughly a year or more) that China’s non-interference policy isn’t permanent, and that one day they will begin to strike back and truly stand up against the U.S. empire, and that time was approaching. But it probably won’t be for years, at best.
I remember reading from a Xinhua article a long time ago (I think roughly a year or more) that China’s non-interference policy isn’t permanent, and that one day they will begin to strike back and truly stand up against the U.S. empire, and that time was approaching. But it probably won’t be for years, at best.
I remember reading from a Xinhua article a long time ago (I think roughly a year or more) that China’s non-interference policy isn’t permanent, and that one day they will begin to strike back and truly stand up against the U.S. empire, and that time was approaching. But it probably won’t be for years, at best.
The Amerikkkan Empire is truly a global dictatorship. That’s why the head of the snake must fall.
Agreed. I can scarcely imagine what can be achieved when China finally takes the fucking gloves off and mobilizes the entire country.
Agreed. China is able to take the “best” of both worlds and uses whatever works in their own context, to ultimately serve socialism. The benefits of “both” systems and almost none of the downsides of either. Though of course, socialism is still the best, in the long run.
To be fair, it could be argued that even though fascism preserves corporate profits, it’s bad capitalism overall, because it ruins the veneer of democracy that capitalism claims to have.
Where as in spite, or even because, of the fact that China is socialist, it’s able to make the best of “both worlds” and utilize capitalism in limited ways and in limited contexts, to ultimately serve socialism. Achiveing the benefits of 'both" and almost none of the flaws.
I wouldn’t say that communism and fascism run somewhat on the same fuel. I feel like that’s neoliberal apologia. But I 99 percent know that’s not how you meant it, and I definitely understand your sentiment. Both communists and fascists see the lie that is neoliberalism. The difference, is our reactions to it.
Communists want to create a society/system that is better for all people in general, and we’re angry that capitalism is only a carrot on a stick used to indoctrinate and browbeat the civilian populace. We’re angry that capitalist democracy is a sham.
Fascists are angry that neoliberalism is too “weak” or nice or not exploitative enough, and that the thin veneer of democracy should be stamped out for full a full dictatorship, that things are currently too democratic.
This is an excellent write-up
I think this also speaks volumes about eastern/Chinese philosophy, especially in terms of conflict. Winning the war, before it even starts. War is usually a tragic, absolute last resort, rather than first or second option, as in the West.
That’s pretty awesome. If you don’t mind me asking, what city?
From what I read, it’s not nearly as oppressive as it sounds on paper. It definitely takes some work and jumping through hoops and going through multiple channels, but your hukou can be changed. I’ve never been to China though, just gleaming from what I’ve read.
You have no reason to be sorry. And holy shit, you grew up in the USSR? I’d love to hear all about it. Even the little details, if you wish.
I feel alot of your same frustrations. I’m Amerikkkan though, and have never experienced socialism first hand. I’m hoping to move to China.
Between J.K. Rowling being a nazi bootlicking pedophiliac transphobic racist crakkker-ass kunt, and how neoliberals misconstrue or champion Harry Potter references to refer to non-white people as “orks” any shred of interest that I’ve ever had in reading or watching anything Harry Potter related is almost gone before I could start.
As much as I like poetic justice, and I understand the sentiment, I can’t support this.
As much as I like poetic justice, and I understand the sentiment, I can’t support this.
We will give a middle-finger to the heat death of the universe by the power of SWCC
I remember reading from a Xinhua article a long time ago (I think roughly a year or more) that China’s non-interference policy isn’t permanent, and that one day they will begin to strike back and truly stand up against the U.S. empire, and that time was approaching. But it probably won’t be for years, at best.
I don’t have the article on-hand, unfortunately. But I appreciate that China seems to be weighing the costs and benefits of the policy.