They see like this all the time.

  • 102 Posts
  • 2.87K Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 2nd, 2021

help-circle


  • Here’s a quick lesson on the way they use these terms.

    If they can directly claim “China bad,” then they will ALWAYS say “China,” “CCP,” “Xi,” etc. A direct identification.

    If they can’t directly claim “China bad” because it’s some other Asian country, but want to paint it AS “China bad,” then they use “Asian” country, factory, etc. Because most westerners, when thinking of Asia, think “China.”

    They want to project the idea that China suffers along with the rest, but since it actually isn’t, they use a broad term that could include China.








  • That goes along with it. There won’t be any official reports. But we will start to get stories that aren’t showing on mainstream. The big sites will block them out but they will start leaking through here and there. A few posts on Reddit. Pictures of Facebook posts before they get removed. Stuff like that. People reporting they talked to their loved one but it felt off. People saying their friend told them they died but the actual military refuses to speak to it. Shit like that.

    And they will be able to keep it up for a while I think. The government is good at dragging shit out and ignoring the plights of service members and their families.


  • At this point I fully believe that the only reported deaths of US military personnel are ones they can’t cover up. I will not be at all surprised if we start to hear stories about family members that haven’t heard from their deployed son, brother, husband, etc but that when they call to ask about them they are either not told anything or told they are unable to get ahold of them at the time.


  • There are always individuals who will try to enrich themselves or advance their personal interests to the detriment of the people/state.

    This is the most annoying bit of liberal propaganda that I see. Not that this is not a true fact. This one statement in a void is true. What is incorrect is the fact that people see this happen in the west, and call it corruption. When their definition of corruption only hold true when you apply it to socialism, which is a system that works for the proletariat.

    Liberals like to scream about “corrupt” politicians in the west. Stating that, these politicians are corrupt for taking bribes from rich people and companies, and thus pushing policies that help them, at the expense of the working class. They call this corruption because they have spent a century trying to convince people that the government of a CAPITALIST nation, somehow works for the people.

    That, in fact, is not how things work. Corruption within a system means some force is working against the intent of the system. On a capitalist system, a politician that takes money from the capitalist class, and then aids the capitalist class, is JUST the system working as it’s intended. Western politicians aren’t corrupt, they are just working as intended.

    This is why, when we see all these things happening and all these “corrupt” western politicians, nothing ever happens to them. They continue business as usual. BUT when you see a politician that is actually trying to HELP the working class, at the expense of the capitalist, that IS corruption of a capitalist system. And what ALWAYS happens to those people? They are slandered and attacked and pushed out. Blocked from making any real change, with massive amounts of wealth thrown at defeating them.

    The thing is, if they admit to this, it might anger the people, and lead to a revolt, so they lie. They claim the government works for the people and that some politicians are corrupt, but doing anything about it would be evil gomminism. Just VOTE them out!

    Meanwhile, in an actual communist country, the western use of “corruption” is ACTUAL corruption. And in many of those, is an actual crime, and punished. Within the CPC, it could even mean an actual death sentence. At bare minimum it is an immediate removal from the party as far as I know.




  • Preface: There always exceptions, but many of those are due to harassment of the imperialism,not the failure of the country. This statement is made against the imperialist and it’s benefactors, not the victims.

    Lands can be made to grow without importing massive amounts of fertilizers. Countries can develop energy infrastructure without constant oil imports. Countries can become self sustaining if they cared to. These countries have become laggard and gluttonous off of the ease of global trade and imperialism.