• Kaffe
    link
    28
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The US is an insincere ally, always has been, always will be. Throughout history the US has always provided aid in such a way that puts their “allies” in a more subservient position, sowing seeds of future crises to take advantage of.

    • 陈卫华是我的英雄OP
      link
      241 year ago

      The US also promises to send Abrams tanks (free, I think) to countries that donate Leopards to Ukraine, thus pushing Rheinmetall out of the European arms market and asserting American corporations as the master arms companies of Europe. Very interesting that Scholtz, the big idiot, hasn’t noticed this.

      • @KommandoGZD
        link
        201 year ago

        Rheinmetall is also pushing to build HIMARS under license in Germany, so they’re turning the European MIC into a subsidiary in a way. Double profits for US producers.

          • @KommandoGZD
            link
            171 year ago

            Funny in a cynical way, I just don’t get why European capitalists and arms manufacturers go along with this. They’re both getting fucked by high production costs and actively pushed out of the market, because all the Europeans are giving away their European arms and restocking with US supplys. Makes no sense to Rheinmetall and the rest as far as I can see

            • @Lemmy_Mouse
              link
              151 year ago

              It’s likely the key figures in positions of power in Europe’s personal balances are being subsidized by the US bourgeoisie or are getting a cut of the profits from the industrialization of their countries one way or another. They behave as imperial capital not as national bourgeoisie.

            • Kaffe
              link
              141 year ago

              They have no choice, the US is already occupying them.

              • @KommandoGZD
                link
                7
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Sure, but here the superstructure is actively destroying its base. Unless we count eg the supposed German superstructural elements in government more as shaped by and maintaining the US base, not their domestic bourgeoisie. Given that eg Baerbock is a German Marshall Fund and Young Global Leaders creature, that wouldn’t be too far off the mark I guess.

      • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
        link
        91 year ago

        Very interesting that Scholtz, the big idiot, hasn’t noticed this.

        He most likely did, but don’t care, after all his masters are in Washington.

    • @knfrmity
      link
      181 year ago

      The US doesn’t have allies, she has interests.

      • World’s Biggest War Criminal Henry Kissinger
  • @Mzuark
    link
    171 year ago

    This is pure performance. Ukraine’s not gonna see those tanks before the war ends.

  • JucheBot1988
    link
    161 year ago

    Apparently Russia just told the United States that using depleted uranium shells in the Ukraine will be considered a nuclear attack, equivalent to a “dirty bomb.” Washington may be trying to hedge its bets.

    • @Shrike502
      link
      141 year ago

      Western media: “PUTLER IS GROWING EVER MADDER, THREATENING TO NUKE PEACE LOVING DEMOCRATIC NATIONS FOR HELPING THE PEACEFUL UKRAINIAN INDEPENDENT NATION! WILL NOTHING STOP THIS MADMAN IN HIS QUEST TO END LIFE AS WE KNOW IT???!!!111”

    • 陈卫华是我的英雄OP
      link
      71 year ago

      The secret “Abrams armor” IIRC is made out of cement mixed with uranium or some crazy shit like that

      • @Shrike502
        link
        71 year ago

        Is it radioactive? I mean, I wouldn’t put it past the gits to use cannon fodder in cancer-inducing machinery, but it would be almost amusing in terms of hypocrisy

        • 陈卫华是我的英雄OP
          link
          61 year ago

          Depleted Uranium is known for its density, and it’s not quite as radioactive as U235. Still radioactive, but not “touching it will instantly kill you” sort of radioactive

          • Arsen6331 ☭
            link
            81 year ago

            It’s not as radioactive, but as a heavy metal, it is toxic regardless. It’s known to damage the kidneys, brain, liver, thyroid, and heart, even without any radiation involved.

              • Arsen6331 ☭
                link
                61 year ago

                When the tank gets hit, some particles would probably get knocked off and start floating around where you could inhale them.

          • @Shrike502
            link
            51 year ago

            Surely it’s still toxic? As all heavy metals tend to be

            • JucheBot1988
              link
              101 year ago

              US military veterans say they’ve developed nasty illnesses from handling the stuff. The US military “investigated,” and found it was totally safe. So you can draw your own conclusions.

              • Yang Wen-li
                link
                91 year ago

                Just speculation, but it could be that the armor is safe in the sense if just sitting there it won’t do anything. However when penetrated the DU is obviously going to break out and float around in the air. Before modern tank armor, a hit usually meant death, these days though if your ammo rack doesn’t go kaput you’ll maybe survive. And in doing so, be exposed to the toxic DU particles that just got sprayed everywhere.

            • 陈卫华是我的英雄OP
              link
              51 year ago

              Well, yes, but not “being exposed to it will completely degenerate your DNA and burn the patterns on your clothes into your skin” type of toxic

            • Arsen6331 ☭
              link
              5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It is, yes, just not as radioactive

  • @Shrike502
    link
    151 year ago

    Tinfoil hat time: this is a PR move to preemptively counter the news of said tanks getting rekt. Media will be all “Well akschually these aren’t real Abrams, the real Abrams woulda deflected them missiles and loiters and shells riiiight back!”

    • Yiazmat
      link
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      yea when the news about sending tanks over came out the first thing I thought was that Russia is probably gonna love spamming pictures of destroyed abrams/leopard tanks all over their media lol

      • JucheBot1988
        link
        41 year ago

        Hunting tigers, leopards, and other big cats has long been a Russian specialty.

    • @illume
      link
      61 year ago

      I also remember The New Atlas essentially saying that this whole thing was a bluff and really only a means of trying to scare Russia into settling for less out of fear that NATO would be totally committed with masses of equipment(and even possibly manpower). This has… really corroborated that theory.

  • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
    link
    14
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If i understand this correctly, Germany didn’t want to send tanks until USA promised to do it too, but while Germany will send them asap, USA promised to make new ones but worse and send them in a year (maybe)? Lol

    • Yang Wen-li
      link
      51 year ago

      Yes, albeit it’s not uncommon for the US to send only baseline models out. The US is very protective with their weapons. Although don’t be surprised if they are canceled, the Abrams is logistically intensive, and probably would be a net negative to the war effort.

  • @201dberg
    link
    131 year ago

    Does this mean they just admitted the expect this war will not be a “decisive” victory and will continue for at least the rest of this year and I to next? So all their articles about Russia being about to loose, they admit, is bullshit. lol

    • 陈卫华是我的英雄OP
      link
      81 year ago

      If Russia can get close enough to the Dnieper on all fronts the tanks could be completely useless lmao