• ComradeSalad
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The vote was unanimous. Meaning that every communist representative voted for this.

    The modern KPRF are a shill party used as controlled opposition by a capitalist liberal majority.

    It’s beyond sad to see how far the party has fallen.

    • rosered
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shouldn’t any communist party that works within a capitalist system be looked upon with a side-eye? Like I can’t expect much from them tbh.

      • Carrow
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        That depends on what they are doing and how they are doing it. If their only goal is to somehow bring about communism by winning a vote in a capitalist democracy, they are obviously ridiculous. But while living under a bourgeois democracy, while the population at large still believes in that system, participation in it can be used as a tool to build class consciousness, to work toward the ultimate goal of revolution. This is essentially Lenin’s position in “Left-Wing” Communism: an Infantile Disorder.

        Participation in parliamentary elections and in the struggle on the parliamentary rostrum is obligatory on the party of the revolutionary proletariat specifically for the purpose of educating the backward strata of its own class, and for the purpose of awakening and enlightening the undeveloped, downtrodden and ignorant rural masses. Whilst you lack the strength to do away with bourgeois parliaments and every other type of reactionary institution, you must work within them because it is there that you will still find workers who are duped by the priests and stultified by the conditions of rural life; otherwise you risk turning into nothing but windbags.

      • Life2SpaceOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s the acronym of the English transliteration of the Russian word for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF), Kommunisticheskaya Partiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (KPRF).

  • coderade
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    They also banned existing trans people from adopting. Tragically reactionary

  • ComradeSalad
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Finding a better source is pretty important.

    This is the Pravda UA variant.

    However, as I watch Russian news constantly, this is sadly true.

    • rjs001
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • ComradeSalad
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you, I actually heard about the news from the RT tv channel themselves, but I mean that replacing the current source might be better.

  • JucheBot1988
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Comrades, why are some of us surprised? We all know what the modern Russian state is. Not even China is fully “progressive” on this issue, so to expect Russia to be is somewhat – well, delusional. Remember what the “critical” in “critical support” means.

    • cayde6ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’d still say that China is light years ahead of Russia on this.

    • ButtigiegMineralMap
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely, we can’t ignore the fact that RT is like 20% just “LmAo a TraNs PeRsOn foR MiSs NeTherLanDs??? UMmm SomOne MaDe a MisTake”

    • Shrike502
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m only surprised it was allowed before that. Or available at all, really. Given the sorry state of everything

  • Lil Kitai
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    From Russia’s POV, Western imperialism and LGBTQ+ has become synonymous, and this was no accident. Just look at the Lockheed Martin funded pride march from a while ago…

    Edit: I’m not trying to make the claim that Western imperialism and LGBTQ+ are synonymous, rather I’m commenting on how Western capitalists have co-opted LGBTQ+ movements and imageries, and this would have the effect of compelling Russia, or other global south countries who sees this, to stray towards a less LGBTQ+ tolerant direction.

    • Life2SpaceOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve read various comments on Reddit and Lemmygrad stating that the LGBTQ+ movement is heavily pushed by the state to provide a distraction to the workers from their economic immiseration.

      I don’t know how true that conjecture is, but it does feel really unsettling how much the imperialists are pushing for it.

      • Idliketothinkimsmart
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        LGBT+ people aren’t an “agenda”. Yes, it’s true that the state tries to co-opt their identity to pink wash itself, but like with any sort of radical history, it tends to get co-opted.

        Look into the history of events like Compton cafateria and Stonewall. LGBT+ history is just as much a part of worker history as any other group’s.

        • Life2SpaceOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not rejecting the validity of the struggle of LGBT+ people. I’m simply giving an observation I made and lightly commenting on it.

      • On Lemmygrad?? The only argument I’ve seen is that imperialists claim that another country is repressing LGBTQ+ people (whether or not there’s any truth to it) to manufacture consent for sanctions and the like, which is certainly true, but I’m not aware of any efforts to “push” LGBTQ+ movements domestically as a distraction from capitalism

      • if_you_can_keep_it@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        They push it because it’s an easy win. Corporations will subvert any cause that doesn’t have directly to do with overthrowing capitalism. They do the same thing with environmentalism and diversity initiatives. That doesn’t mean that those things are inherently bad or part of some sort of secret plot.

  • taiphlosion
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unfortunate that their misunderstandings about the human body has led to this.

  • quality_fun
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    i never did support russia’s government. now i have even less reason to.