You’ll see anarchists praising Rosa Luxemburg, who if they had actually read her writings – they would see that she was very clearly one of the “authoritarian” socialists that they rail against so much.

You see them praise the Black Panthers, who were supported financially by the DPRK and aligned themselves with the Juche ideology of Kim Il Sung.

They even praise Thomas Sankara, who purged anarchists and arrested syndicalists.

If these people had succeeded, i have no doubt in my mind that anarchists would call them “tankies,” they would call their experiments “capitalism with a red flag.” And I also have no doubt in my mind that if the October Revolution, Chinese Revolution had been crushed, they would hail Lenin and Mao as proletarian heroes.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another thing I find hilarious with Anarchists is that many of them are huge EU supporters. Turns out they’re totally fine with centralization and large unelected bureaucracies in practice. These people are just LARPing.

    • Comrade Boina
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      lmao I literally clicked this thread to post this exact essay

    • toomanyjoints69
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also think that during a revolution the most intense promises will be made so its the equivalent of judging a candidate on their election promises versus the guy who won and actually got the chance to do not perfect.

  • angrytoadnoises
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, Anarchists don’t seem to actually want to succeed in anything. They just want to perpetually feel superior about their morals as well as comfortable that nothing will ever change. They want to be cool, contrarian good guys, imagining a world that will only ever exist in books and stories.

    • ColonelRevolution
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why my anarchist phase was short-lived. I was reading about anarchism and I found out that many of them don’t even expect that the revolution will succeed. It’s just a desperate moral opposition to the status quo without any serious intention to change the material reality.

      Not a great strategy to make the world a better place lol

      • angrytoadnoises
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m very much the same. Had a short anarchist phase, don’t entirely disagree with a lot of the worldview, but feel the situation is too desperate to rely on fantastical situations when there’s already existing theory on how to fix the world.

  • ButtigiegMineralMap
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    A Psalm from the Apostle, Parenti: “They do not explain how the manifold functions of a revolutionary society would be organized, how external attack and internal sabotage would be thwarted, how bureaucracy would be avoided, scarce resources allocated, policy differences settled, priorities set, and production and distribution conducted. Instead, they offer vague statements about how the workers themselves will directly own and control the means of production and will arrive at their own solutions through creative struggle. NO SURPRISE THEN THAT THE PURE SOCIALISTS SUPPORT EVERY REVOLUTION EXCEPT THE ONES THAT SUCCEED.”

  • savoy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re pretty much more liberal ultras. They bang on about this wonderful utopia and tear down any attempts at socialist revolution or maintaining a workers state. And not only that, but they don’t put in the needed work into building towards revolution or increasing class consciousness among the working class. They’re entirely fine trying to build cooperative farms or doing performative mutual aid.

  • Mzuark
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most self professed leftists don’t actually have a plan for what happens if they get the revolution they want. I guess they think the point of the ideology is just killing people and burning shit, not creating a better society.

  • Valbrandur
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Aside from the what it is to be said by the already recomended text on western marxism and christianity by Jones Manoel on RedSails, which I find very fitting here, I have found out by experience that anarchists usually have a very strong tendency to romanticize the act of revolution in general, of sublevation to overthrow the existing hierarchies, and very little focus on what comes after, which is the organization of the new society that is to come.

    Chances are that this lack of focus is the result of the development of an anarchist’s conceptualization of a post-capitalist society falling an overwhelming majority of times in one of two fields: either authoritarianism (most of us have witnessed an anarchist accidentally developing the idea of vanguards in their search to defend their revolutions) or the most bizarre and impractical modes of production and self-defense that could be concieved, such as the idea that medicines and other highly complex products could ever be produced by individual people as a form of pastime.

    This is, overall, too much hassle for the average western anarchist, who doesn’t find the need to concern themselves with that simply because, for them, anarchism is just an aesthetic used as a form of expressing one’s identity and individuality, and not as a project to work towards.

    Edit: Grammar.

  • ReaZ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is easy to support failed attempts because then they can imagine that this time those folks would have done things “perfectly” or in other words, the way the person imagining it would have done things. Without any of the messy details of having to work in the real world with real conditions.

  • StalinsMoustache
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    for the revolution to succeed, youll need some sort of mechanism to oppress the oppressors. Most anarchists seem to want the revolution, but dont want to secure it cause oppression /authoritarianism/hiearchies is bad. A problem with being an absolutist.

    • CPCsStrongestWumaoOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      yeah. that part about how Che is seen by the western left, in comparison to Castro, rings true

  • Drstrange2love
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Online anarchists are a flandering version of the ideology they preach.

    • diegeticscream[all]🔻
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re ok with a longish read, I think this lays it out pretty clearly:

      https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1906/12/x01.htm

      The short answer is that anarchists and ML’s don’t have the same goals, and don’t have the same chosen methods to reach them. The only thing we agree on is (roughly) who the enemy is: capitalism.

      It goes back over 100 years to the Bakunin/Marx split in the first international. It’s been going for a while!

    • CannotSleep420
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The sectarianism is annoying (inshallah for Hexbear federation to bully the sectarians), but the narrative about MLs regularly teaming up with anarchists only to stab them in the back turns out to be bullshit when investigated.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Btw an anarchist from blahaj coming here and complaining about sectarianism is mighty rich when a 80% of entire lemmy modlog bans are people banned from there for being “tankie” - specifically interesting since their comments for which they are banned are not specified, that is, they haven’t been banned for anything concrete.

        Also preempive fishing for a ban, lol, how old they even are?

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Can you just spare yourself an utter embarrasment and block us or better yet, create an account on instance which have defederated from us if that’s so important to you?

            that will not spread misinformation about my political beliefs from ones that will.

            That’s incredibly hypocritical of you to say after what you wrote in this thread.

        • CPCsStrongestWumaoOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “NOOOO, LENIN JUST LET THESE SAILORS BREAK AWAY IN THE MOST STRATEGICALLY VALUBLE NAVAL LAND WHILE THERE’S CURRENTLY 13 FOREIGN NATIONS INVADING YOU. THEYRE MORE IDEOLOGICALLY PURE!!!”

    • CPCsStrongestWumaoOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      i dont want left unity. also, “misinformation?” you’re telling me that no anarchists praise the black panthers? that no anarchist praises rosa luxemburg and sankara?

        • SovereignState
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You almost certainly support regimes who would have me executed for being queer

          The final battlecry of the faux-“leftist” who refuses to actually engage with revolutionaries who actually do things.

          If you engaged with us in good faith whatsoever you would realize that a disproportionate percentage of us are LGBT+. We’re also scientific socialists and believe in something called nuance.

          I am certain that you believe RFA nonsense regarding LGBT rights in AES nations. You should have seen the resolute joy permeating this site when Cuba passed the new family code. Vietnam will hold a similar referendum in 2024 and I have a ton of hope the Vietnamese people will make the correct choice. Being a worker’s democracy, I believe they will.

          How does it feel knowing the AES world is progressing at 10x speed the capitalist world ever has? How does it feel to see successful socialism in action while you can’t even name a successful anarchist territory, yet claim the Zapatistas do not have the right to differentiate themselves from western “anarchism”?

          I respectfully await Blahaj’s self-inflicted demise, and for you to study.

        • diegeticscream[all]🔻
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          My cause is the welfare of the working class.

          Diabetics dying without insulin after the dissolution of industrial society is apparently good for the working class.

          I’m always curious about this when I talk to argumentive anarchists. When was the last time you read a book? Like, any book?

  • mo_ztt ✅@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why put the Black Panthers in here? 🤨

    The Black Panther platform, as I understand it, was:

    • We want freedom. We want power to determine the destiny of our Black Community.
    • We want full employment for our people.
    • We want an end to the robbery by the Capitalists of our Black Community.
    • We want decent housing, fit for shelter of human beings.
    • We want education for our people that exposes the true nature of this decadent American society. We want education that teaches us our true history and our role in the present day society.
    • We want all Black men to be exempt from military service.
    • We want an immediate end to POLICE BRUTALITY and MURDER of Black people.
    • We want freedom for all Black men held in federal, state, county and city prisons and jails.
    • We want all Black people when brought to trial to be tried in court by a jury of their peer group or people from their Black Communities, as defined by the Constitution of the United States.
    • We want land, bread, housing, education, clothing, justice and peace.

    The Juche platform is:

    • We must give our all in the struggle to unify the entire society with the revolutionary ideology of the Great Leader Kim Il Sung.
    • We must honor the Great Leader comrade Kim Il Sung with all our loyalty.
    • We must make absolute the authority of the Great Leader comrade Kim Il Sung.
    • We must make the Great Leader comrade Kim Il Sung’s revolutionary ideology our faith and make his instructions our creed.
    • We must adhere strictly to the principle of unconditional obedience in carrying out the Great Leader comrade Kim Il Sung’s instructions.
    • We must strengthen the entire party’s ideology and willpower and revolutionary unity, centering on the Great Leader comrade Kim Il Sung.
    • We must learn from the Great Leader comrade Kim Il Sung and adopt the communist look, revolutionary work methods and people-oriented work style.
    • We must value the political life we were given by the Great Leader comrade Kim Il Sung, and loyally repay his great political trust and thoughtfulness with heightened political awareness and skill.
    • We must establish strong organizational regulations so that the entire party, nation and military move as one under the one and only leadership of the Great Leader comrade Kim Il Sung.
    • We must pass down the great achievement of the revolution by the Great Leader comrade Kim Il Sung from generation to generation, inheriting and completing it to the end.
    • diegeticscream[all]🔻
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Black Panthers were complimentary of the DPRK, and had warm relations with them:

      https://archive.ph/QYo19

      I don’t think your quote is a summary that really shows what the BPP might’ve liked about Juche:

      The Juche idea was created on the basis of such a practical requirement of the Korean revolution. The revolution is a struggle to meet the masses’ desire for independence by enlisting their strength. It is a struggle of the masses to free themselves. When they are armed with the revolutionary idea and united into an organized political force, the masses can emerge victorious in the revolution. The duty of revolutionaries is to go among the popular masses, masters of the revolution. to educate, organize, and inspire them to a struggle. The revolutionary forces, too, should be trained from among the masses, and all problems arising in the revolutionary struggle should likewise be resolved in reliance on their wisdom and strength.

      (On the Juche Idea - Kim Jong-Il p7)

      I italicized the bit that stood out to me as most like the BPP.

      The DPRK is mostly viewed pretty well here, btw. It’s not an insult or a smear to align the Black Panthers with them. It’s a compliment.

    • Black AOC
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the Panthers and the DPRK end up getting mentioned in the same breath a lot because of the communications they shared; though nothing I’ve studied ever suggested they outright adopted Juche. If someone’s got like-- hard and fast recollection that’s stored somewhere that they did, though; I’d very much like to see it if only for completion of my own understanding.

      • mo_ztt ✅@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed, I’d like to see it as well. Because to me, it sounds a lot like this type of smear that’s common in American politics. “You gave an award one time to this POET who also advocated for BLOWING UP THIS BUILDING so clearly you support everything he said, so you’re a terrorist!”

        The specific assertion was that the BPP “aligned themselves with the Juche ideology of Kim Il Sung.” I’m asking, is that accurate? Or did they just talk and were they both generally socialist in nature?