Im seeing a lot of posts on reddit celebrating Ukraine victories. So what’s actually happening in this war now?

  • Hammer + Sickle = ☭A
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 years ago

    the easy answer is; no

    The harder answer; As the other commenters said, fog of war and all that. But they’re currently holding many of their most logical objectives for what was laid out (non-occupation, denazification, defence of the separatist regions). Because they’ve seemingly decided against taking the major cities outright, western news media is spinning it as “Russian failure” or incompetence. If we address military theory, it’s likely Russia’s military commanders have decided to blockade and siege the cities instead of wasting life and resources trying to take them. As well, surrounding a city is virtually the same as taking it.

    If Ukraine’s leadership was wiser, they would have surrendered a good while ago, but because they didn’t Russia’s strategy is getting stretched and is in need of an update.

    • guojing@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      Ukraine is really not an independent country that can decide to surrender on its own. That decision is made in Washington, and they will fight to the last Ukrainian.

  • 陈卫华是我的英雄
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    4 years ago

    A lot of the Reddit posts showing “destroyed Russian convoys” are actually destroyed Ukrainian convoys lmao

  • Mzuark
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 years ago

    It’s so unclear. Russia basically won in the first week, but the definition of “victory” is unclear because their goal was never to occupy Ukraine. What I think is happening is that the Russians are withdrawing, but the media is spinning it to sound like they’re being chased out by Ukraine.

    • guojing@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 years ago

      Whats happening is that Russia is preparing to attack the cauldron in Donbass where the strongest part of the Ukranian military has entrenched over the last years. About 50-60.000 soldiers. When they are defeated it will be a major blow for Ukraine.

  • chad1234
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 years ago

    Reddit is mostly US government bots. The Western Fake News MSM is also providing a very distorted depiction of events.

    As the others suggested, you should read the Scott Ritter thread.

    Remember, the US pretended that it was winning in Afghanistan for 20 years. It will be interesting to see how long they keep up the illusion this time.

    • RedBritBully
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 years ago

      Having been banned from Reddit for talking MList talking points instead of neo shitlib, I can confirm.

  • knfrmity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    4 years ago

    As far as I can tell Russia has achieved what they planned to so far, and have plenty of resources in reserve for the battles to come. Ukraine is fucked and the only reason Zelensky hasn’t given up yet is because his balls are in a NATO star shaped vise.

    The Scott Ritter Twitter thread already linked is good to go over the general strategy. I have found Brian Berletic’s weekly updates super informative as well (YouTube, The New Atlas).

  • Idliketothinkimsmart
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 years ago

    2 things to take into consideration:

    • Us officials estimate Russia still has 80 - 95% battle capacity still at their disposal
    • Ukranian presidential adviser just said Russia has completely destroyed Ukraine’s defense industry

    Have things stalled? Perhaps, I’m not a military strategist, but given the two facts, I’d say no.

    • InvertedMussolini
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 years ago

      Another thing to take into consideration is that by no account is Russia intending on this being like Iraq, Afghanistan, or Vietnam.

      I think it’s quite obvious even to an average observer that Russia could have caused massive S H O C K A N D A W E destruction to Ukraine’s infrastructure but they did not. This doesn’t mean that Russia’s objectives in this offensive are failures, it means that attempting to understand Russian objectives through the lens of US invasions simply does not fit.

      I’d say that it’s most important to focus on the economic moves that Russia is making now and what implications they will have moving forward to the global economy. The fog of war (and propaganda) surrounding offensive is intense and largely impenetrable but what happens on the level of geopolitics and the global economy is easier to trace out and I’d argue that it’s much more important.

  • pgtl_10Banned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 years ago

    Hard to say but if Ukraine is winning then why does the government keep asking for more weapons, a no fly zone, and NATO security guarantees? You don’t keep asking for that stuff in major publicized events if you are winning.

    That Mike Hertling guy went on CNN and when asked what Ukraine needs right now he basically listed out a whole new military.

    Slowly Western media starts admitting things.

  • AmerikaLosesWW3Banned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 years ago

    When China wins in the future, will Americ*ns cope the same way by announcing that they haven’t lost yet?

    • KlargDeThaym
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 years ago

      They will. They’re already used to rejecting conventional reality and inventing one of their own.

      • AmerikaLosesWW3Banned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        Sort of a rhetorical question, but yes, even when America crumbles to dust, they will still be proclaiming that they are the best country in the world. There will be no end to their delusions, though I can’t say the same for their material future.

  • Shaggy0291
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 years ago

    I’ve just had to write an article on this. The lion’s share of the most experienced Ukrainian soldiers seem to be encircled in Mariupol. Once the Russians finish pacifying Mariupol they’re likely to strike out west for Odessa, landlocking Ukraine. One potential end game scenario most commentators consider possible is that Ukraine will be reduced to a rump state, with all the Russian speaking people in the south and east being cobbled together into Russian aligned breakaway republics like Donetsk and Luhansk. This would leave Ukraine greatly diminished in territory and demographic power (~a quarter of Ukraine’s population is ethnically Russian), along with other economically disastrous factors like loss of access to all ports on the black sea, not to mention the loss of important urban centres like Odessa itself.

    An important aspect to bear in mind which I think is a strong indicator of which way the wind is blowing is the use of air power in this war. While at first there was a lot of footage of Russian jetss and helicopters flying low to evade Ukrainian air defences and occasionally being shot down by MANPADs it now appears the Russian air force are targeting the Ukrainian rear at Lviv, seemingly with impunity, from far higher altitudes. This suggests to me that Russia has achieved air superiority.

    • sinovictorchan
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 years ago

      You mean that Ukraine military does have air force? The American fake news claim that Ukraine lack air forces and that Zelenskiy is begging for military air vehicles from NATO.

      • Edwarder
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 years ago

        They had Airforce. The problem is, you need airfields and fuel for those. Ukraine suddenly started having problem with both in the recent month.

  • No_Steel
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 years ago

    i also heard something about Ukraine winning fights from the radio at the store. Scary how they’re constantly feeding us propaganda no matter where we go

  • RocketLauncher
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 years ago

    Ukraine is relying on foreign support so it doesn’t sound like Ukraine is winning at this moment. Not that you can’t with foreign support, but Ukraine is heavily reliant on them and they’ve lost control of their airspace.

  • ZDreamer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 years ago

    I see it this way:

    1. Russia is moving large amount of forces from Kiev and other places to the east, where the most powerful part of Ukraine army is holding near Donetsk.
    2. In doing so it relinquished control of territories around Kiev and some other places.
    3. Ukraine is moving large amount of forces from Kiev and other places to the east, probably to Dnepr(city, somewhat to the west of Donetsk.
    4. Overall, approximately half of the forces of each side will be between Dnepr and Donetsk (probably).
    5. There will be big battle there (it is already going and will intensify). It may decide the outcome of war.
    6. It seems that people inside Russia are fairly confident in winning this battle but it will not be easy.
    7. People in Russia do not know, what are the plans after the battle. Will we stop there? Take east/south Ukraine? Additionaly take central Ukraine (Kiev is there)? Take west part of the country? Nobody knows (except, maybe, leadership).