• HaSch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    10 months ago

    When Beijing’s top official for the city visited it in April, he did not meet the real estate developers association, which represents some of the richest families, raising questions over whether the interests of the wealthy clans are even a major concern to the top leadership.

    Presumably questions such as “WTF?”, “You do know what a communist is, right?”, and “Have you recently been experiencing dizziness, eyesight problems, or weakness/numbness radiating from one side of your face, arms, or legs?”

    • SovereignState
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      refusing to even acknowledge real estate developers exist is so real of him wtf

      • cayde6ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        I kinda wish they would have met with the developers and told them they were narcissistic douchebags with their days numbered.

        • SovereignState
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          “Thank you for so readily categorizing yourself as a terrorist organization and saving us the trouble.”

    • Blinky_katt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I honestly thought you made up this quote to be ironic, only to find it’s actually in the article. Orz

  • QueerCommie
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    Send this to Ultras who think the current CPC is on the “capitalist road.” I’m wondering what the supposed environmental concerns were. I wouldn’t imagine golf courses are the most environmentally friendly. Don’t you need a bunch of herbicide to maintain the grass? Lawns are a huge waste of space. I’m assuming it’s just bourgeois cope.

    • DamarcusArt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      They’d find some technicality or something, most likely insisting that they are still revisionist capitalist roaders because the golf course existed in the first place.

      • cayde6ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        While they conveniently ignore that despite China’s attempts at restoring democracy, Hong Kong is still a de-facto British colonial territory. The handover was in name only.

    • HiddenLayer5
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’m wondering what the supposed environmental concerns were.

      Envsci major here: golf courses are the worst fucking thing in a city short of an oil well. Approximately 0% of the plants there are helpful or even remotely suited to the ecosystem (especially one like South China) and worth preserving, it’s hostile to wildlife and pollinators, is toxic due to the excessive pesticide use, exacerbates soil erosion, and is generally a massive resource sink. Put some gardens with native flowering plants around those apartments or on the balconies, some native trees as well, and it’ll be worlds better than a golf course. Not sure about this one but speaking generally, an urban neighborhood with high density housing can actually integrate into the ecosystem and be sustainable if managed right, far more than golf courses can at least.

  • Absolute
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m very excited/interested to see how the CPC tackles the housing problem in Hong Kong. This is a great development to see

  • BenEarlDaMarxist
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nice. Never really was keen on golf, outside of its weird gimmick of “less strokes = more likely to win the competition”, the comically large open courses aren’t really helping since I kinda see them as wastes of open area.

    • JucheBot1988
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s a dumb sport for people who don’t like sports, but who do like to spend a lot of money on gear.

      This is my totally unbiased opinion.