Even the catastrophic scenario means Ukraine loses lots of territory (Odessa) but is still able to stabilize the front and survive.

“rules-based world order”

  • 小莱卡
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Rules based world order has to be the stupidest dogwhistle ive ever heard for western hegemony.

  • Mzuark
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I love how they consider Trump being elected to be an apocalyptic outcome. Liberal brainrot strikes again.

    • DamarcusArt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hey! When he was elected in 2016, I very distinctly remember the world ending! You tankies refuse to learn from history!

  • taiphlosion
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 months ago

    Where the fuck do they keep getting this idea that Russia is going to “keep invading other countries”?

    They really do live in an alternate reality

  • alcoholicorn [comrade/them, doe/deer]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 months ago

    So what happens in the perfect scenario? Russia gets another Yeltsin in charge who sells off their industries for scrap, like what happened in Ukraine? Navalny or some other fascist gets in charge?

    What’s Russia look like in 10 years?

    What’s Ukraine look like after it’s been immiserated by the fire-sale of it’s state-run industry, schools, ports, and powerplants, predatory loans, war, and is politically locked into the right, having banned all leftwing parties?

    What’s Ukraine look like in 10 years?

    • SpaceDogs
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      10 months ago

      It is odd how there are more details in the “catastrophic” scenario than the “perfect” one. Like, what does the defeat of Russia truly mean?

    • 小莱卡
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I think regardless of the outcome, Ukraine will be the poorest/most exploited country in europe lol.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Moldova was worse, Ukraine was second-worse. It changed something like one month into the war and since then it’s getting worse still for almost 2 years.

          • DamarcusArt
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ah, ok. I remember Ukraine being both the poorest (I think per capita) and the most corrupt prior to the war, I could easily be wrong though.

              • DamarcusArt
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                18
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I must’ve heard the two used interchangeably at some point, thanks for letting me know, last thing I want to do is mention Ukraine being the most poor and corrupt country in Europe before the war and have some shitlib go

                “umm acktually Moldova was technically the poorest, so I can now safely ignore your entire argument about how the west is fucking over Ukraine?”

      • alcoholicorn [comrade/them, doe/deer]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Maybe? I could imagine a divided Ukraine where Western Ukraine gets the Marshall Plan treatment and Russia supports development of Eastern Ukraine. Then again, maybe capital is so advanced it’s no longer capable of even that.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          10 months ago

          Except there is no chance for Marshall plan, if anything USA is pillaging Germany and rest of EU in revrsed Marshall plan now.

          • Shrike502
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Wasn’t Marshall plan a deal to plunder European industry and not let them rebuild themselves, but rather to indent them to USA?

            • PolandIsAStateOfMind
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              Absolutely, though not to “not let them rebuild” but to rebuild with murican economical, military and political strings attached and control them. It was sowing, now they are reaping.

        • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          if this were the 50s, they would do that. i dont think they have the political will (or brain) to do a marshall plan on western ukraine at this point.

  • SpaceDogs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 months ago

    Catastrophic seems incredibly hyperbolic, and this is coming from someone who catastrophizes a lot. They truly believe Russia wants to take over the world, huh? Out of all of these the subpar option seems the best/most realistic. The end of Western support should be added to the subpar section considering the war is the only reason they’re sending “aid,” once the war ends what reason would the West have to stay?

  • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 months ago

    If they’re convinced that Russia will invade again if Ukraine is not in EU/NATO, then Russia wouldnt be interested in a peace negotiation in the first place since Russian domestic support for the war is still high and the Ukrainian position is increasingly untenable even with Western support. If the Russian goal is to annex everything up to the Polish border, they wouldn’t stop now when Ukraine is at its weakest.

    It only kind of makes sense if you believe that Russia has lost 9 gorillion men and is about to run out of munitions (any day now, Bellingcat!). Therefore, whoever prepared this chart is fucking delusional either way you slice it.

  • comrade-bear
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think the sub par seems likely, although the NATO falls apart bit seems wonderful

  • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    What if the settlement involves a Russian-driven security guarantee?

    Since an obvious read of the war is “Russia wants a sphere of influence”, a sarcastic take on that is “sure, but you have to pay the costs of having one.”

    Then the West starts asking ChatGPT how to translate “Bay of Pigs” into Ukranian, and trying to make their obligation an expensive hassle without actually tripping a treaty.

    • DamarcusArt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t you know? Russia is an evil country run by extra evil orks and the most extra evil ork of all is Putin, that’s why Ukraine can’t trust Russia to agree to any security deals, because they would just break them! Probably, I think, maybe. The western media tells me that they will, so that’s good enough for to switch my brain off and stop thinking for myself on this one!

  • Catradora-Stalinism☭
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    the worse it gets the more im okay with it

    i mean actually i would just like peace after this war, ukraine was fucking nuts already