• DankZedong A
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    10 months ago

    Probably tastes better than half the protein shakes I tried

    • 201dberg
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Bruh… Gotta find some better protein powder.

    • Ronin_5
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Humans produce CO2.

      The difference is whether you produce CO2 flying private jets or relieving famine.

      Also, you would have to spend energy to go the other way, as CO2 has lower energy than protein.

      • QueerCommie
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        Fossil powered meat production is not the best way to relieve a famine.

        • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          EDIT: I see you have redacted this take. That being said,

          This is being produced from fossil fuel & steel production waste gases, so it’s a way to eliminate emissions by trapping them with specially engineered microbes. Reading about the pathways they’re using is actually really cool.

          We’re not getting rid of steel production any time soon, so turning emissions into ethanol (rather than using agricultural products) seems great.

          In general I am skeptical of “greening” fossil fuels but the opportunities to make them less harmful present themselves immediately when you look at all the redundant burning and shit involved.

          Substituting green sources for the energy intensive fractional distillation process & the hydrogen feedstock in making gasoline could be easier if the overall production of fuels were much lower. (Renewables + continuously chugging fractional distillation seems like a bad mix but batteries are getting way better all the time.)

          I read about some of this stuff & how oil refineries work first when I was arguing with “genes aren’t real” and “oil is renewable” patsoc people actually. Lol

          • QueerCommie
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            Interesting. It would be liberalism to think that innovations like this could fix our environmental crises without a revolutionary transformation of the relationship of humans and non-human nature, but considering this is largely an accomplishment of socialism, and China has greater plans than small changes, this is good. Patsocs always have weird anti-science takes, but those are new to me.

            • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I can give you a long list of battery tech & hydrogen stuff & renewables especially coming out of China that makes me hopeful, as well as ecological civilization shit that doubles as climate resistance like sponge cities that Malaysia’s getting into. and also some example of stuff i’m not big on we’re doing like the 70s era carbon sequestrarion US/EU keep pushing and the like coal to hydrogen lmao

              • QueerCommie
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                I did a whole project on this last year, but I’m sure there’s more new stuff that you’re more up to date on than me.

                • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Maybe. Idk if I mentioned the new desalination stuff that looks promising. Other random stuff

                  cold plasma pyrolysis of trash -> syngas (i’ve read this can be quite efficient correct me if i’m wrong)

                  sodium ion batteries (appliances and other applications where density is less important, there are already power drills)

                  redox flow batteries (very long term storage with many cycles perfect for renewable power stations & datacenters, made from cheap shit, can completely replace large lithium bricks)

                  zinc solution hydrogen batteries (80% efficiency vs 50% of compressed hydrogen gas, zero fire hazard)

                  floating wave generators for supplying outlying islands nations throughout the pacific

                • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  oh also on the lithium ion front, there’s a cellulose mesh being messed around with that triples the number of recharges you get. and lithium-sulfur is actually feasible now

          • QueerCommie
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            Regardless of the initial hot take, upon further looks this is a positive development assuming it helps promote future developments and not just fossil meat as the title suggests.

            • redtea
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Tbf, my instinct with things like this is to assume that it’s more greenwashing or similar. They’ve tried to have us on too many times before for me to be very trusting.

              • QueerCommie
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                10 months ago

                Yeah, on the one hand it sounds like greenwashing, on the other, it’s China.

    • 201dberg
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, if we use CO2 to make organic matter then burry it in the ground and wait long enough we could get more fossil fuels to then make protein out of.

    • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      On top of the other points I mentioned (such as sourcing this from emissions which are hard to avoid creating) + raised by Yogthos and other people, I’ll add that coal can be stored pretty much indefinitely, and using coal for methanol/ethanol/protein (whatever the applications are) like this instead of boosting agricultural production saves energy in its own right, even it ultimately releases more carbon.

      I don’t think anyone is actually saying get in the pod and eat the coal. As funny as it sounds

      • the problem i have w that is the methanol synthesized can be used in further synthesis, rather than as feedstock. we have enough agriculture to feed the world, there’s just a distribution problem. this coal to methanol to protein process will just go to feeding livestock, sustaining industrial torture/murder and increasing pollution. methanol could be used in other processes (as solvent or reagent) that have better value. plants make protein from solar energy, we don’t need to waste carbon that’s already been fixed to make more protein just to create more cattle to torture and eat

        • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Oh come on don’t do the vegan nihilism thing, you could even say increased grain production is used to fuel animal farming. That doesn’t mean agricultural technology isn’t exciting.

          Methanol is used for lots of stuff I think it eventually goes into plastic yeah it’s exciting.

          Do you mean chemical feedstock or animal feed?

          This could also be a source of protein for mushrooms or insects (yum), or maybe they can find a way to process this into stuff for agriculture. Finding this pathway is just part of engineering more crazy Yellowstone/Mariana Trench microbes.

          I’m sure I’m ignorant of potential industrial grade protein applications

        • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          if we’re not looking for a problem to have with the creation of the technology, it is quite literally like you could take wood that was harvested from Kopásek that is to say new wood that is not like petrochemicals from an older carbon cycle, but something is rapidly pulled out of the air by trees. You can literally just keep coming off the smaller branches of trees then you can burn that and turn it in the woods gas. The one gas from this can be made in the methanol by this bacteria, which, then it can be fermented directly into proteins. The fuck in Chinese have invented alchemy, said let’s eat trees and rocks. apologies for any dictation errors.

        • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I hope there isn’t some kind of forthcoming possible scenario where humanity has to survive in a pinch with less arable farmland, in that event we’d surely be able to rely on the nations of the world to share protein in a crisis?

          😶

            • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’m just saying it has a famine relief purpose so you don’t have to let livestock just die if there’s like a brief but manageable nuclear winter? I realize these are insane burger fantasies

            • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Sorry was the comment about producing smoke and syngas and stuff too incoherent? Because you can harvest biomass without logging & it’s much more carbon neutral.

              Directly trapping unavoidable emissions like coke for steel & turning them into methanol then increasing the applications of that with fermentation or substituting other methanol sources (which can be carbon intensive afaik) just seems like a net good.

              STRATEGIC EDIBLE COAL RESERVES

  • Pili
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 months ago

    I can’t wait to get shredded eating coal.

    • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      this is just proof that the west will invent a time machine eventually. china will then steal it, and use it to steal the coal->protein tech from the west (of course the west will invent that too), and because they’re cheaters, they’ll then use the time machine to pass the tech back to the present day.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      Kids getting coal for Christmas in 1950: 😭

      Kids getting coal for Christmas in 2050: 😍

  • BenEarlDaMarxist
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is- a rather strange way to make animal feed (I think I’m just reading through the intro).

  • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    “The researchers achieved a dry cell weight and crude protein content of 120g/litre and 67.2 per cent with their modified P. pastoris. And the methanol-to-protein conversion efficiency reached 92 per cent of the theoretical value,” a report on the CAS website said. The high conversion rate makes this protein production method very attractive economically. “It doesn’t require arable land, is unaffected by seasons and climate, and is a thousand times more efficient than traditional agricultural practices,” Wu said in the paper. “Moreover, the protein content in the micro-organisms ranges from 40 to 85 per cent, significantly higher than in natural plants,” he added. These organisms also contain a complete amino acid profile, vitamins, inorganic salts, fats and carbohydrates, allowing them to partially replace fishmeal, soybeans, meat and skimmed milk powder in various applications.

    What’s the catch? Is it cancerous??? Where are they getting all these nutrients?

    The ethanol production line also sounds like it improves emissions from coal if I’m reading correctly.

    • Ronin_5
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The catch is that you’re eating coal yoghurt.

      The coal is used as feed to grow the culture, similar to how milk is used to grow bacteria in normal yoghurt.

      Edit: methanol derived from coal or any other source would be used to feed the culture

    • 201dberg
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yeah I am interested in knowing more about how they do this and what their feed stock is. Vitamins and such don’t come out of thin air or just methanol. They have to be feeding this yeast something else.

      If it’s sustainable to some degree though it would be interesting to see if we could replicate this action with non-fossil fuel materials. Like using starch derived from CO2. Algae tanks are also pretty efficient carbon sinks as well. If we could use that, or convert it to higher protein sources. Pretty much any way we could instead suck CO2 out of the atmosphere instead of pumping even more in from fossil fuels would be great.

  • 201dberg
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Might you have an Archive link for the paywalled kind comrade?