@felipeforte@lemmygrad.ml Reading rn.

I’ll probably be up for an hour or two more; we can maybe talk about this in the Matrix Room.

Oh absolutely.

You’re right.

Clicking the link rn.

And yes, that’s pretty much what I mean (what you clarified, more precisely).

It was.

@chad1234@lemmygrad.ml

@pimento@lemmygrad.ml

@roylemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml

@nour@lemmygrad.ml

@TheFreePenguin@lemmy.ml

@Frogsknecht@lemmygrad.ml

@yogthos@lemmygrad.ml

@AgreeableLandscape@lemmygrad.ml

@protestation@lemmygrad.ml Thanks for posting this!

Yes

I mean: are you the actual Invent The Future account that I see sometimes on Twitter and has their own website, or do you just happen to have that name.

Sorry if I still worded the question weird.

😅

Equality for females is a Marxist idea developed in the 19th century.

Where has this been all my life!?

Okay, I’ll definitely explore and check it out more.

Could be more of a tactical retreat, but it is telling.

I wouldn’t say that. The USA will last for a long time yet, but it’ll be a slow death; good for us, but we need to brace for the long haul as this is a marathon, not a sprint. Take action now, but brace for the long haul.

Scholarly journals can be both good and bad. I’d be careful with making sweeping generalizations (not that you or the article did, of course), but I think more people should read academic journals and get acquainted with them, even some of the bad ones (but mostly the good or great ones, of course).

@AgreeableLandscape@lemmygrad.ml

I think Jacobin is okay for certain articles, but when it comes to foreign policy, they fall short… I mean, I’ve seen some of the garbage on foreign policy issues; it isn’t pretty.

Long live the CPC… in Canada.

I hope that the CP in Canada takes charge on this issue

Thanks for sharing this article.

Sigh

The problem is Gonzalo’s Maoism and Internet communism; all the SolidNet parties are for China. All the activists who are Marxist that are actually organizing are for China. Frankly, I think it’s mainly the social media Marxist-Leninists on places like Reddit and so on that treat this like a debate.

The problem is that Marxist-Leninists should be sectarian… against Maoists and New Left ideas.

Sectarianism only applies to the communist movement; we shouldn’t consider Maoists to be apart of the international communist movement.

IMHO

Frankly, it’s an idea, but I’m not 100% sure on how it is to be handled, if at all. But every time a communsit Internet space stresses being “anti-sectarian” it results in Maoists eventually taking it over. I saw this happen at least three times and heard about occasions were Maoists affected the bent of the community, all in the name of “anti-sectarianism.”

@muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml can give you the rundown, I suppose, about the Maoist mods on /r/com.

We’re just getting started.

No, but it is a good thing, if only a small victory.