Bit of a hiccup there

  • supersolid_snake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s so hilarious, how western Europeans are so desperate to differentiate themselves from the eastern “hordes”. They get no advantage by joining nato, except having to spend a shitton on weapons and possibly freezing and paying 5x for gas but the prestige of being “western” is too much of a pull to deny.

    • jamabalayaman
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      You don’t get it, it’s not about some “prestige”, it’s just imperialism. At the end of the day, all of these countries have to dance to America’s tune, their “sovereignty” is a joke lol

    • CritiGalDesist∞
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      “modern” “democratic” “western” alliance with “freedom” “morality” and “justice”

    • Shrike502
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      For Finland especially, joining NATO would be incredibly stupid

      Why’s that?

        • Shrike502
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          That border is exactly why they’re advocating for the membership. Consider: how many NATO members did Russia have an open war with in the past thirty years? How many non-members? That is the logic being applied here. If you go off the premise that “Russia is expansionist and Putin is a megalomaniac who wants to rebuild Soviet Empire”, it makes some strange type of sense.

          • ☭ 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗘𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 ☭MA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Of course, from an imperialist (pro-US) point of view, it more or less makes sense. The population has probably been led to believe that they should fear a Russian invasion if they don’t join NATO. My point was that I don’t think Russia is anywhere near as willing to accept NATO expansion as it was 10 years ago, so I can’t see how this could possibly improve Finland’s security

            • Shrike502
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Well what are the options? Actually invade Finland if it gets signed up and risk the Article 5? Not to mention that Finland is not Ukraine and had a lot more time to prepare and shore up, not to mention the border with Sweden - a major arms manufacturer. And that’s not even getting into the viability of a war on two fronts.

              • ☭ 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗘𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 ☭MA
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                The options for Russia? Militarily, I don’t think there’s much they can do that wouldn’t risk WWIII. Economically, in 2019, about 14% of Finland’s imports came from Russia, but it’s clearly far less dependent on Russia than many other European countries, so I don’t know how much of an impact ceasing trade will have.

                For Finland? The alternative is to try to restore neutral relations with Russia or at least to not officially join the world’s largest terrorist organization, but I’m far from an expert w.r.t. geopolitics or economics, and I’m also not from Finland

                Either way, I don’t think there’s much chance of Amerika (and the rest of NATO) de-escalating unless the people revolt

  • cfgaussian
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Unfortunately i don’t think this is very serious, i think Erdogan will extract concessions from the Swedes and Finns about stopping being so cozy with the PKK, and then he will ok it.

    I would put more hopes on Hungary, however even there i could foresee a scenario in which the EU or US come up with a sufficiently large bribe to sway them.

    In the end though, whatever happens, NATO can just break its own rules and claim it had to make an exception. I don’t think unanimity will be a concern for much longe.

    • aworldtowin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Can someone fill me in about countries like Sweden and Finland allowing people’s war folks in? This seems so weird but maybe I’m just not informed enough about the PKK. Same feeling as Sison being allowed to safely live there. I don’t get why NATO allies are friendly with Maoists actively engaged in pww lol

  • CommunistWolfOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    A fun implication: .uk has already signed a mutual defence thingy with Finland, designed to give them cover in the period between applying and joining. If that period is years, rather than months, it puts them over a barrel.

  • Rafael_Luisi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Finland apparentelly did no learn its lesson from the White War.

  • Shrike502
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Erdogan’s been acting too independent for a NATO memeber lately. Guess the next coup against him might succeed.