• redtea
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 year ago

    No ML denies that China is ‘authoritarian’. They argue that all states are.

    Almost everything Marxists say is poorly understood by their detractors and framed in a negative light in one way or another.

    what as far as I can tell is the rest of the academic world that doesn’t agree with you?

    This makes it seem as though you haven’t read the literature and arguments of either side. If that’s the case you shouldn’t be coming to any conclusions at all, especially to dismiss one side outright for being unorthodox. By definition, the counter narrative is going to sound unorthodox in light of the orthodox claims. The correct approach is to read the source and judge it on its own merit and in light of other known facts.

    • DamarcusArt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      “No investigation, no right to speak”

      -a quote from an EVIL AUTHORITARIAN!

      • redtea
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same energy as saying that Soviets ‘pressed’ women into science careers in the same era as liberals were paying Nazi fashion designers (Dior) to design clothes for women (the ‘new look’) that made working almost impossible, so as to force them back into the home after their taste of (relative) freedom during the war years.

        (To be fair to Dior, his sister was based and he apparently named a perfume after her but my source for this is rather cleansing (Wikipedia) so who knows how true that is.)

    • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      This makes it seem as though you haven’t read the literature and arguments of either side.

      Correct, I have not studied this event.

      If that’s the case you shouldn’t be coming to any conclusions at all

      You’ll notice I didn’t come to a conclusion.

      dismiss one side outright for being unorthodox.

      Your position is in fact unorthodox in my culture (U.S.) – that’s what I’m saying. If you have a non-standard position, if you actually want to convince people you need to make the information accessible and give people a reason why they should believe it over their normally acceptable sources. Making fun of them is probably counter-productive (even if it is fun).

      • Fiona (she/her)🏳️‍⚧️
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        68
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re proudly proclaiming that you know little about the subject? Yet you still felt like joining in, because…?

        Not to mention the fact that you’re essentially asking that people chew up this complex topic and regurgitate a dumbed down version… because you’re a yank and being uneducated is part of your “culture”?

        You can read, and you have a mind, it’s up to you to put those two things together to inform yourself and form opinions.

        • CriticalResist8A
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          because you’re a yank and being uneducated is part of your “culture”?

          Why did you paraphrase culture, it’s true 😬

        • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nope, I’m assuming y’all want to get people on your side right? I was just giving an example of what people outside of your bubble see when they see posts like this. No need to get your panties in a bunch.

            • urshanabi [he/they]
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              1 year ago

              To clarify for some of us that don’t understand, are you saying the poster is sealioning or engaging in bad faith? I haven’t ever seen this word and I’m not sure if there’s some specific reference I am not getting.

            • DamarcusArt
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              1 year ago

              Rare to see an anarchist one. Though I’m guessing this one is “anarchist” because they have a Rage Against the Machine tattoo and went to a BLM protest once (But left early because some of the other protesters made them feel uncomfortable.)

      • “In 2023 saying Tiananmen Square massacre never happened is an extraordinary claim” is a conclusion. If you publicly claim that something happened, you should be prepared to provide some kind of evidence, even if it’s flimsy. If you’re actually willing to learn, read section 3 of this article

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your position is in fact unorthodox in my culture (U.S.) – that’s what I’m saying.

        In Nazi Germany in 1944, I think it would be regarded as an unorthodox position that Jews aren’t specifically inclined towards greed and evil conspiracy to destroy the Aryan race. By your epistemology, wouldn’t it be true that the person defending the Jews is the one that has the burden of proof and not the people who cling to antisemitic conspiracy theories?

        • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be clear, I’m not speaking of this event, I never made any claims of knowledge about this event.

          • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            37
            ·
            1 year ago

            you’re just loudly denouncing everyone who has investigated the event in question as wrong because they go against your (admittedly) ignorant view of reality

      • 201dberg
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        you actually want to convince people you need to make the information accessible and give people a reason why they should believe it over their normally acceptable sources. Making fun of them is probably counter-productive (even if it is fun).

        Says an “anarchist”

        On a post

        About a book

        That’s is literally the source of the information in which you say we should be proving.

        You not only have no right to complain about being made fun of and harassed but deserve it. lol

        • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you expect everyone to read your book? How credible is this author? What about this book makes a true understanding of the events accessible rather than just being another person voicing their opinion of evidence the choose to accept?

          • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            ·
            1 year ago

            this is pure JAQing off. you’d have answers to your questions if you spent more time investigating and less time regurgitating state department propaganda

            expecting everyone to do the work for you because you’re too lazy is LIB shit

            • o_d [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              28
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              We always do the work for them anyway and it’s still not enough to permeate the thick lib brain barrier.

              • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                y’all are doing god’s work out there comrade. even if no known substance can pierce their ultradense skulls you might still catch someone who can be saved, and that’s worthwhile

          • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            1 year ago

            bro, just go read the book, or at least parts of it and skim for quotes to smack us down with, if its really that flimsy fucking get us for it!

            “I could beat you up if I wanted to but I don’t so I won’t waaaaaaaa”