• 陆船。
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 year ago

    The west offshored its emissions to China and still pollutes more. Almost impressive really.

    • JucheBot1988
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s that “Faustian western spirit” that Richard Spenser and his ilk like to talk about so much.

  • Nobilmantis@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Convenient how the individual-centric capitalist west always talk about “China emissions” as a whole while the per-capita is never mentioned.

    • Soviet SnakeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not so much the per capita part here what matter but the fact that it looks at consumption. It doesn’t matter if it pollutes more from production if the consumption of such production ends up being exported.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also never mentions historical emissions where it looks REALLY bad for the west.

    • bandarawan
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of coal burning if I remember correctly. They need a lot of heat in winter.

    • Soviet SnakeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because this does not list net emission but rather consumption per capita, it does not make sense to blame China for producing, since basically what happened is that the West outsourced its industrial sector to China, but the consumption of the Chinese production happens outside. So even though the US outsourced it to China, they are still the biggest polluters by consumption per capita.

        • Soviet SnakeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          They have the #1 because the default sorting is CO2 Emissions (tons, 2016), when you change it to CO2 Emissions per capita (tons) it gets pretty low on the list but the number doesn’t seem to be affected, which is bad for visualization honestly.

  • SpaceDogs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I honestly thought Canada would be darker red than it is considering our oil sands…