the one man who can stop it, Vladimir Putin
first rule of liberalism: the whims of a few individuals are the source of all geopolitical changes
Liberalism: Great man theory
Neoliberalism: Any man theory
Good one
Not even pretending Zelensky, the other world leader involved in this garbage, has any ability to cease hostilities.
Decisive victories such as: “losing several batallions for empty ground”, “Wait, they evecuated the city and retreated?!”, “Take whatever weapons you like and go wild.” and of course “The western Wunderwaffe just bounced off that tank. Ohshitohfuck.”
Damn, almost a year already. Time flies.
But I was right when I said it wouldn’t last “weeks” like Russia originally said. They all said that, but wars never end that quickly unfortunately.
Never heard decisive victory in the same sentence as stalemate
deleted by creator
True, though in military usage the term usually describes a situation where neither side can gain a decisive victory over the other. So the article is doubly nonsensical
You can tell we’re being lied too because this article is actively avoiding talking about Ukrainian losses.
Ukraine’s victories were indeed decisive, but they happened to decide in Russia’s favour
Stalemate: “losing triple digit soldiers a day”
There’s also rumors of an ethnic cleansing of Transcarpathian Hungarians by sending their predominantly Hungarian 128th Mountain Brigade to hold Soledar. Transcarpathia residents are disproportionately showing up in obituaries.
Twitter links were detected in your comment. Here are links to the same locations on Nitter, which is a Twitter frontend that protects your privacy.
Link 1:
Link 2:
When you’re winning so hard, you’re taking massive casualties, losing all your tanks and missiles and can barely maintain your battle lines.
nothing that was said in this article is true.
