Genzedong’s quarantine on reddit now arguably breaks this law.

  • @Shrike502
    link
    362 years ago

    I think we all know which viewpoints this law will be used to defend, and which conveniently will not fall under the purview.

    • JucheBot1988
      link
      232 years ago

      “I disagree with what you say (not really), but I will defend to death your right to say it (that you’re a fascist).”

  • AgreeableLandscape☭
    link
    20
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    According to capitalist states, we’re promoting terrorism (aka, socialist revolution). They see us as on the same level as ISIS or Aum Shinrikyo, so probably not.

    • @RedCat
      link
      172 years ago

      It warms my heart to know they are this afraid of us gaining more traction.

      • AgreeableLandscape☭
        link
        62 years ago

        Until they start arresting communists just for identifying as communists. Like in Nazi Germany, or, like Poland and Ukraine currently do.

  • commet-alt-w
    link
    182 years ago

    but fails to curtail that social media is an arm of the national security state, and always has been, and still maintains who and who cannot raise the topics of violence and onto whom

  • @lil_tank
    link
    142 years ago

    Federal court be putting the peaches in the freezer

    • @anothertranscomrade@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      132 years ago

      “For the bourgeoisie, freedom of the press meant freedom for the rich to publish and for the capitalists to control the newspapers, a practice which in all countries, including even the freest, produced a corrupt press.” -Lenin

      • @GloriousDoubleK
        link
        82 years ago

        Yeah. He aint wrong.

        I used to critically support free speech as some ideal to uphold.

        But the past 3 years it has occured to me that what too many mean by free speech is to have the freedom to lie.

        Not like there’s a way to prevent people from speaking freely. These days, the whole freedom of speech thing just reeks of pure idealism.

  • @Idliketothinkimsmart
    link
    122 years ago

    If I’m getting this correct, the lower circuit court is at odds with the supreme court? Would that mean enforcement of it would probably be along “partisan lines” in each respective state?