• Shrike502
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Makes me wonder what we aren’t hearing about. We already know about pedophilia island, the blood transfusions, surrogate motherhood industry. Now this. What else is there?

    • ComradeSalad
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The surrogate motherhood industry disgusts me so much, surrogacy could be a good and even noble service a person could undertake in a socialist world (given weren’t coerced). But the industrial baby farm levels of horror of rich people traveling to third world nations to pay the most disenfranchised people 10 dollars to carry a baby is downright revolting.

  • relay
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I can’t imagine anyone doing this except for some sort of really crazy ritual magic with imperialist characteristics.

  • Aru
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    deleted by creator

    • romaselli
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably just the fact that they have a relatively high circumcision rate and lower per capita income than say, the USA, so young Korean moms are probably more willing to sell their baby foreskin for less lol

  • Life2Space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    American media is disgustingly decadent; always publicly discussing about genitalia, sex, drugs and other yuck without a hint of shame.

    • Water Bowl Slime
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Huh? American TV is very Christian - sex and drugs are usually only brought up when they’re being used to teach the audience a lesson about how they’re sinful. It’s rare when they’re mentioned in another context and even more rare when they’re discussed without euphemism.

        • ComradeSalad
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But how? Most nudity, sex, and drugs are used artistically, metaphorically, or for historical purposes, just blatant sex and drugs is still crude and distasteful, no one has lined up to see movies like that since the early 2000’s, and even then those were usually campy bad movies anyways.

          Like thinking about Oppenheimer and it’s “sex scene”, what’s so special about it? It showed he had an affair with a woman, and then you see her boob for 4 seconds. The utter horror.

          That’s hardly “shameful” or “crass”.

          • Aru
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            23 days ago

            deleted by creator

            • ComradeSalad
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              : (

              Thanks for acknowledging the name I guess. I was genuinely curious about the topic, I’m sorry if it was a bit aggressive.