• PolandIsAStateOfMind
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Current ruling class delegate the theory to their inteligentsia lapdogs like Friedman or Sowell and to the secret services, but past ones definitely did read it.

      • redtea
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not only that, but iirc Hoover also ‘wrote’ books on communism. It’s not very good, but he tried, bless him. (They’re very likely ghost written, and possibly by the same people who ghost wrote for Conquest.) Not sure about later directors.

        Aside: how tf can one be a director of a secret service – the FBI, no less – through seven presidencies, while calling others totalitarian?

        • Shrike502
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Aside: how tf can one be a director of a secret service – the FBI, no less – through seven presidencies, while calling others totalitarian

          By juggling definitions

      • knfrmity
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        Can’t speak to all theory, but the US government hired Michael Hudson to teach them how Superimperialism works in the 1970s. Apparently the CIA used the book as a manual on how to do dollar dominance better.

        • Lemmy_Mouse
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Michael Hudson

          Just looked him up, now he’s shilling for industrial capital trying to grift it as the solution to the economic crisis 😂 It’s where we’re likely heading in some areas (Russia is already there, likely Europe and England) but WW1 wasn’t an accident, and neither was it’s end 😉

          • knfrmity
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah, he’s a mixed bag. Sometimes you’ll get very pointed analyses of global economics, sometimes it’s just bs. Apparently his family were Trots so maybe that’s part of it. In part he’s right, in that productive capacities need to be built up and developed, but his insistence on the necessity of “mixed economies” and in some cases industrial capital is definitely off.