• @Stalins_Spoon
      link
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What do you mean by ‘socialist(ish)’?

      • QueerCommie
        link
        101 year ago

        They were led by urban intellectuals who didn’t understand the peasant masses (it was even more feudal than pre-revolution China), so they did stupid stuff like going back and forth on weird anti-religious policy constantly. Listen to the deprogram episode on it (episode 52).

        • @ComradeSalad
          link
          91 year ago

          Granted, that is also because no single government cabinet really lasted long enough to solidify their positions, goals, promises, and governmental apparat beyond the armed forces. Yes it was all the “same” government, but assassinations, coups, American interference and pressure, and cabinet reshuffling made work very difficult.

          • QueerCommie
            link
            71 year ago

            Of course, they didn’t do very little good for no reason. I’m sure in a world without imperialism they would have done much better

  • @ComradeSalad
    link
    151 year ago

    Yes, they gave him massive quantities of military supply, ranging from M-16’s to Stinger missiles, to tanks and trucks. Here is a news article from 1993.

    • stasis
      link
      61 year ago

      yet the US pretends to be against him

      • @ComradeSalad
        link
        101 year ago

        No, they were very heavily against him, very much so.

        But only when he bit the hand that fed him and he turned on his masters. Only then did he become a threat and target.

  • @supersolid_snake
    link
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ask yourself who their allies in Syria are aside from just rojava (leaving them for another discussion). Same shit, another time.