• cloud@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        You may want to read the biography of Marx and the historical events of the 19th century. Wikipedia offers a good recap and data for further reading.

        • DankZedong A
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          1 year ago

          You could read actual works by Marx but it would require being able to read pages longer than a Wikipedia article.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Franz Mehring wrote thick biography of Marx, he was direct witness of many events and knew even more participants. I must read it someday when i will have some time.

          • cloud@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            34
            ·
            1 year ago

            Your assumption that the person you are talking to isn’t familiar with it gives away that you are full of bullshit. Pick up a bunch of history books irl and read them from start to finish. Stop learning from memes and reddit posts.

            • DankZedong A
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              26
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The person I’m talking to links Wikipedia articles and tells me to read ‘history books’ lmao. Of course I’m not taking it seriously.

              • cloud@lazysoci.al
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                23
                ·
                1 year ago

                And who do you take seriously? People telling you exactly what you want to hear?

                You seem familiar with Marx so cross check yourself the data with Wikipedia

                • ∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/its]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Ah yes, cuz Wikipedia is the holy grail of information. No, don’t read stuff by yourself, don’t pick up a book, just use wikipedia.


                  fucking liberals

                  Damn, you’re proving why we have this emoji

                • cfgaussian
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes debunked claims such as Stalin being a dictator, which all historical evidence shows that he wasn’t.

                  • Anarcho-Bolshevik
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Uhhhhhh…wait…uhhhh…uhhhhhh…when you say

                    all historical evidence shows that he wasn’t

                    what you really mean is

                    all historical evidence shows that he was

                    right???

            • ∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/its]
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ok. I mean, I’m not going to do it IRL, since I have them on my tablet, but I’ll go read Blackshirts and Reds, Triumph of Evil, the Book of the Hopi, The Cold War and Its Origins, The Hidden History of the Korean War. I’ll also recommend you read them.

              Edit: How could I forget Killing Hope?!

              • relay
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                Whichever the media, you get and understand its contents.

              • redtea
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                Grover Furr, Khrushchev Lied and Dominico Losurdo’s book on Stalin are also quite good.

              • cloud@lazysoci.al
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                20
                ·
                1 year ago

                Read them all and draw your own conclusions on whether Stalin was a brutal dictator or someone to worship. I suggest you to read on paper or eink display to not strain your eyes.

                • cfgaussian
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Stalin was neither a brutal dictator nor someone to worship.

                  • Anarcho-Bolshevik
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    WAIT wait wait wait wait, hold on, okay…so…uhhhh…okay, so, when you say

                    Stalin was neither a brutal dictator nor someone to worship.

                    what you’re REALLY saying is

                    Stalin was a brutal dictator and someone to worship.

                    is this right??? pls tell me

                • comrade-bear
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  https://dessalines.github.io/essays/socialism_faq.html#did-the-soviet-union-repress-and-kill-millions-of-people Again, why don’t you address nothing that’s been presented here, if you are so sure on your points, you can certainly present a competent argument about why those sources are not to be believed or why the other sources are better, let’s debate history, sources, methodology instead of just calling people dictators and posting wikipedia links, again make an argument for the sources that constitute the wikipedia articles you are mentioning, let’s move the discussion forward, I’m not against the debate, but let’s have one, you are asking everyone to read stuff, but what about you read some of our stuff as well, and let’s have a civil discussion about stuff.

        • redtea
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          What if we went straight to the further reading?