(I don’t know why it also says Pirate Bay, since I clicked on the Sputnik News URL)

  • knfrmity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They do it by forcing DNS server operators to remove certain entries. You can get around it by selecting a non-censoring or non-EU based DNS provider or running your own resolver.

    I remember German libs jumping with joy back in late 2021 when Germany blocked all remaining “evil misinformation spreading Russian state media.”

    • rjs001
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • knfrmity
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In looking into this again I found a supposedly serious legal breakdown that literally says that in the intro paragraph.

        To address legitimate questions of double standards that will come up in the wake of the inevitable whataboutism, it should be stressed that the Union’s measures differ decisively from any authoritarian censorship by virtue of the Union’s character as a community of law.

        https://verfassungsblog.de/the-eus-ban-of-rt-and-sputnik/

        The case for blocking Russian media is made on the basis that it is “propaganda for war,” yet one cannot seriously argue that what western media is doing isn’t propaganda for war.

        • rjs001
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          deleted by creator

        • Addfwyn
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          yet one cannot seriously argue that what western media is doing isn’t propaganda for war.

          Well you see, they are the Good Guys, so they can’t do propaganda. That is only for authoritarian dictatorships, not enlightened democracies like civilized European countries. Otherwise, their totally free media would call them out on it.

        • DamarcusArt
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          So…their argument is literally just “it’s ok when we do it?” not even trying anymore. Though I guess they don’t have to.

  • Buchenstr
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    yeah cause ‘muh freezedom o speezch’ tells me that russian media is poison that’ll make me hate ukraine and the west. Its for my own safety after all.

    • knfrmity
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      EU blocks Russian media. Meanwhile the European Court of Human Rights punishes Russia for blocking Russian content.

  • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does anyone know if Sputnik News has an RSS feed? I tried looking before but couldn’t find it for my news reader.

    • cfgaussian
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why not? They are actually a decent news source and they often provide points of view that have been entirely scrubbed from the media in the west.

  • CannotSleep420
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think that’s for the better. Sputnik is a fake news russian propaganda outlet like russia today. It’s the russian equivalent of RFA/RFE/VOA.

    • cfgaussian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And who told you that, the liberal western media? Sputnik and RT may have a pro-Russia bias, just like CGTN has a pro-China bias, but they are actually way more reliable than western mainstream media. The notion that they are on the same level of fake news as RFA is nothing more than imperialist propaganda.

    • LarkinDePark
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you think you should be blocked from accessing BBC for similar reasons? If not why not?

        • LarkinDePark
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          This would just leave you blind to what the masses are being inculcated with. You wouldn’t be able to understand the constantly evolving and latest indoctrination narratives being employed against the working class. It would leave you unempowered to understand and help them.

    • Addfwyn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They wear their biases on their sleeve for sure, but I wouldn’t say they are anything like RFA/RFE. I wouldn’t say to use them (or any singular source honestly) as your sole source of news, but they’re not a bad one to have in the rotation.