• Muad'DibberOPA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 years ago

    I’m at the very beginning stages of mandarin, just with apps and some audio lessons I found. Honestly outside of the written part, its the easiest, most well constructed language I’ve ever seen. Despite being an old language it seems like someone sat down and eliminated all cruft that most languages seem to get.

    • Makan
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 years ago

      It helps that Pinyin is really intuitive.

      I’ve also learned Mandarin, or rather, I used to learn it. Now I’m learning Turkish in order to live in Turkey, but afterwards, I plan to hop right back in. Honestly, don’t be daunted by the number of hanzi you have to remember; just keep in mind that many non-Chinese learn thousands of hanzi just fine eventually. You will too.

      • TeethOrCoat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        Pinyin is not that intuitive. Stuff like Bo is more like Buo while stuff like Zhuo is correctly Zhuo and not Zho. Zho is actually Zhou. The ‘i’ sound has an extended consonant sound, unlike the ‘i’ that we’re familiar with in English which would sound like ‘ee’ or ‘ai’.

        Also, Mandarin was my first language, grew up speaking it predominantly and I doubt I’m even close to knowing a thousand characters let alone be able to write them. In exchange for a stunted Mandarin, my English fundamentals are better than many of my peers. I’ve had colleagues who used to joke that I’m probably better than most USians and would ask me for help on words they were unfamiliar with.

              • TeethOrCoat
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 years ago

                Then like the Xinjiang bullshit, i think it’s prudent that your assessment be dismissed.

                • Makan
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  No, because you didn’t’ prove anything either.

                  • TeethOrCoat
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    Read my 1st paragraph again. I gave examples actually. I’m only asking you to do the same.

    • WTOS
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 years ago

      I’m also learning mandarin, and I have to agree. Being a native English/Korean speaker, it’s nice knowing how much easier it is grammatically and logically. 是, 了, 不, 都,etc. aren’t riddled with exceptions and conjugations. If I have to sit through another test of figuring out if a sentence is present perfect continuous tense I will lose my shit. Getting the tones right and internalizing pinyin is definitely its own set of challenges however.

      • TeethOrCoat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 years ago

        You actually chose 2 rather bad examples in 了 and 都. Example: 了不起 vs 吃饱了 and 都是 vs 成都. 是and 不 are at least consistent.

      • Muad'DibberOPA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 years ago

        I’m on numbers, days of the week, and like holy shit, math nerds could not have come up with a simpler system.

        • WTOS
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 years ago

          LOL I know what you mean. I stumble with the measure words here and there, like apparently saying "二个。。。“ is incorrect as it should be "两个。。。“ .

          • TeethOrCoat
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 years ago

            Ha, sorry to disappoint you, but 二个 is not incorrect exactly. Exception incoming. Example: 第二个 would be correct over 第两个.

            • WTOS
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 years ago

              Lol no worries, I’d rather someone point out stuff than not at all. Looking back on my textbook I found that subchapters use ”第一节“ and “第二节” format, so its main usage would be exclusively for listings and ordinal numbers?

              • TeethOrCoat
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 years ago

                Yes that is it’s main usage. There’s another exception though that breaks this rule. You place a 十 in front of 二 and you can link the character in the same way as 两.

    • TeethOrCoat
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Ha, I’d like to see the day when people here get better than me at the language. I’m perpetually stuck at like a middle school (to you USians) level. Now that I think about it, standards have probably risen across the board from when I was last in school, so I’d guess I’m barely past elementary level right now. I used to suck (still do) at writing essays since my fundamentals were dogshit. I could get away with the comprehension tests by utilizing contextual clues to piece together meanings.