Lmao where do we start with this?
-
French imperialism being opposed to US imperialism? What?
-
Ah yes, because lending money automatically makes you imperialist, peak brains at work here
Equalizing what the Fr*nch did to us with China is an insult to us.
You brown person couldn’t possibly comprehend, let me the white man explain what China is doing to you 😎
Oh that’s so stupid especially France being anti us no way that’s true lol.
But we had to rename them to freedom fries after 9/11
I forgot the anti American French praxis after 9/11 /s
If being a Dengist means lifting 800 million people out of poverty then I guess I’m a Dengist.
France developing the productive forces? Pfff give me a break 😂
It’s the exact opposite lmao
It shames and angers me internally that many “Maoists”, you know, followers of the man who believed that nothing was above reproach or criticism, that they dogmatically worship cherry-picked quotations of Mao and lick the boots of Amerikkkan imperialism
The only work of Mao’s that I’ve read to date is the one where he specifically warned against this.
Love when they call China imperialist, refering to Lenins “Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism”. One can only come to that conclusion if one ignores everything after the chapter titles.
how can people look at france with its endless stream of coups and military interventions, countries being forced to use their currency, and loans being used as a pretext for “restructuring” (without the loan even being forgiven most of the time), and think its the same as china with low to no interest loans that are often forgiven in their entirety for nothing, and building infrastructure. like how does that compute in these peoples heads.
'Uses symbols of. revolutionary past". What? The symbolism and nature of the two revolutions are not the same. How do they not see that?
Terminally online Maoists are just libs in a red coat of paint, everything is vibes based to them, they do not allow analysis of events, only empty knee-jerk reactions to things based on how “pure” they perceive them to be (usually the less successful the movement, the more pure they deem it).
The book said “revolutionary past” not “nature of the two revoutions” so the nature gets ignored.
What’s that about book worship being bad? Propably some dengist shit.
They are ultras. They wouldn’t be if the understand more about revolutions.
Man these M&M glowies make my brain melt
“Imperialize” is not a word.
it actually is, but it doesn’t mean what the poster thinks it does
