The truth is that, at least currently, the socialist movement in the USA is at the “agitate to radicalize” step, and if you try to go further without having a large number of leftists who support you, that’s called adventurism
Based Marxist-Leninist-Kollontajist
The truth is that, at least currently, the socialist movement in the USA is at the “agitate to radicalize” step, and if you try to go further without having a large number of leftists who support you, that’s called adventurism
I mean “remixing” in the sense of creating your own derivative work. Computer-generated images have no labor added, so therefore have no value. The idea that the artist should receive additional stipends for derivative works made relies on the fact that under capitalism, digital artists cannot receive compensation in whole. The original artist did not put any labor into having others make derivative works.
“Who is preventing you from distributing digital art?”
With a .png file, nobody. But not all digital art boils down to just saving a .png file. Try redistributing Nintendo video games (also a form of art) and avoiding a lawsuit.
“They should not be left in the dirt if they make a successful piece of art” So… they should be treated differently if many people remix their art? You didn’t somehow magically put value into an art piece when someone remixes it. When someone remixes your art, they are the sole people adding value to the already-generated value created when you make art. The number of people being interested/uninterested in your art doesn’t randomly change how much work you put into it.
No. Labor was put into the art, in the same way labor was put into the “create a bicycle” button. The bicycles are not the art themselves, they are meant to be stand-ins for the valueless copies of digital art. (This is not saying that digital art is not valuable, this is merely saying that copying digital art to another device creates no value) Regarding physical art, while it is naturally scarce, the IP of the art is not the same as the physical art piece itself. The advent of digital art is what created the contradiction between artists getting paid and derivative works being made. This post is not about collectivizing the physical pieces of art, it is about collectivizing the intellectual property created by making art.
Just need to print some of these and plaster them all over my local 汉奸市
“Who decides what is art and deserves a grant?”
Answer: Members of an Artists’ Council, who are democratically elected and their positions can be revoked at any time by a majority vote. As for the idea that “this turns art back into a commodity”, this is a comparison between apples and oranges. The pricing of a commodity is not agreed upon by a group of democratically-elected people who are coerced by their position being beholden to a vote of the people to have fair pricing. Your argument implies that any production where compensation for labor occurs is commodity production.
I do think that copyright could be abolished in one country that’s a proletarian dictatorship rather than waiting until world communism to do so.
I’m not talking about the creation of art as “pressing a button and presto”. I’m talking about the idea that when you have the digital art on your computer, you can spread it to multiple computers.
The last part is kinda preaching to the choir, but whatevs
It’s storm.front, whaddaya expect? Deep theoretical discussion?
Actual translation: You! Have you signed up as a volunteer?
Jamie Olive Oil
Use cal1.iv.ggtyler.dev
It’s the only instance that still lets you download
I’ve spent my time around German YouTube. This comment section is prolly 90% “wE’rE nOt nAziS wE jUsT hAtE bRoWn pEoPLe” AfDlers and 10% unashamed Nazis
To get back to i386 theme you need to edit your config. To download your config, press the export button on your profile, then change the theme field to “i386”. Then import that config, and voila!
But for some reason i386 blue isn’t appearing in theme select
I would not be surprised if patsocs were actually CIA plants created in order to stir chaos within the communist movement
So, what you are saying is that a literal CHILD is more based than you
“sHe’s bEiNg pAiD bY tHe seEseEpeEE!!!1”