• 201dberg
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    Two potential thoughts here.

    1. “Oh I’m sure it’s the “economic worries” that is driving this and have nothing to do with his blatant support of an ongoing genocide.”

    2. "Now that I think about it though, I would not be surprised if the genocide had nothing to do with it and many Americans simply do not give a shit till it impacts their wallet. "

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      I imagine each point is a factor for different demographics. People who have financial problems are worried about how they’re gonna make ends meet, while people who are better off are increasingly becoming uncomfortable that their party is openly supporting a genocide.

  • davel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    The moment I saw his presidential campaign commit to Bidenomics as their central platform six months ago, I knew his goose was cooked.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m guessing they really thought they could sell people on the idea that the economy is booming back when they coined it.

  • الأرض ستبقى عربية
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The economic worries are only getting started. There’s a new war brewing.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/dec/17/us-to-announce-expanded-protection-force-for-red-sea-shipping

    And Saudi Arabia is resisting US pressure to join in a coalition against Yemen

    https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/edge-over-red-sea-attacks-riyadh-seeks-contain-fall-out-2023-12-06/

    Saudi Arabia is probably benefiting from the increase in oil prices without having to draw the ire of the US government if it had cut production

    https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/18/investing/bp-pauses-transit-through-red-sea/index.html

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      You might be on to something here. They could try to start a new war to divert attention from the collapse in Ukraine, and to run Biden as a war president. There are two main problems I see with this plan. First, it’s not clear that US has enough materiel left over from Ukraine for the scale of the conflict they’re going to find themselves in. Second, Yemen will likely attack Saudi refineries which will lead to an energy crisis in the west. Gas prices is the one thing that Americans pay attention to during elections. Having gas shoot up through the roof would be absolutely catastrophic for the dems.

  • Drstrange2love
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Who would imagine that the worsening of material conditions reflects on the government’s popularity, you can’t use the Trump ghost forever.

    • Addfwyn
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      you can’t use the Trump ghost forever.

      Oh but gosh-darned it, they are going to try. Long after Trump is dead, they will continue to invoke his specter to try to drum up guilt-votes. He’s the best thing that ever happened to the dems.