This should help us cut down on the trolls. We recommend other instances do the same, because they will likely be targeted also.

I apologize for all their gore-posts as well, no one should have to see that. We’ll try to look for more admins from different time-zones as well to get them faster.

The two other possibilities we have currently as options, are turning on required email verification, and as a last resort, closing signups. I personally would rather not do either, but they are options.

Many thanks to @k_o_t@lemmy.ml and @AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml for banning those trolls.

    • Tomat0@lemmy.ml
      3·
      3 years ago

      Fantastic idea! I actually never thought about this, this could probably be done fediverse-wide.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    7·
    3 years ago

    The brigading is really unfortunate and thanks to the admins for doing all the work to contain it. As Lemmy grows in usage requiring email verification may be unavoidable, but hopefully having a registration application will do the trick in the immediate term. Something like this was bound to happen sooner or later, so at least this is a useful test case for how such brigading and spam can be addressed going forward.

  • Mossy@lemmy.ml
    81·
    3 years ago

    I downvoted and reported as many posts as I can, I don’t know how much that helped but it was good to check back a couple hours later and see that the trolls’ posts had been removed

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    6·
    3 years ago

    Perhaps to avoid this type of user, a pre-school intelligence test would suffice.

  • Salamander@mander.xyz
    5·
    3 years ago

    Thanks a lot! I have implemented this in my instance too. This past week I was also saw several accounts being created to post ads.

  • mtumishi@baraza.africa
    4·
    3 years ago

    After upgrading to 0.15.1, I activated the signup form. I haven’t had to deal with the daily trolls. Not ideal but it helps.

  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
    62·
    3 years ago

    I think having more admins from more time zones is the best solution, then e-mail verification and then having to fill out a form because it takes time to be reviewed and it takes more time from me because i have to write shit and anyway i can lie.

  • stopit@lemmy.ml
    4·
    3 years ago

    No worries. I have seen surprisingly few of these types of posts, so you’re currently doing something better then other alternatives and I appreciate your efforts to make things even better.

    • tmpod@lemmy.pt
      1·
      3 years ago

      Would be nice to hear why you think it’s bad and how to improve it. Could you open an issue on the tracker?

  • CHEF-KOCH@lemmy.ml
    32·
    3 years ago

    You do not need to apologize for actions of others, you did your best and you found a solution for this issue which is what at the end counts.

    My idea was to introduce some sort of reputation based system but the problem is, that bots maybe could abuse the system to upvote themselves to get some sort of credit or reputation, call it what you want. Most boards use captchas and eMail verification systems to workaround this. Maybe an option would be to enable captchas for users who have below x posts as a middle ground.

    • obbeel@lemmy.ml
      5·
      3 years ago

      Reputation would just turn this into Reddit, where you can’t do anything or interact unless you use a single account or post what Reddit would like you to post.

    • Star Wars Enjoyer A
      2·
      3 years ago

      The Lemmy devs have already decided that karma is just a bottomless pit that just harms users mental health, so it’s highly doubtful we’d ever have a reputation system be introduced, as that’s literally the same thing.

      Also, captchas can be preventative to people with certain disabilities, so introducing them (I believe it would be reintroducing, actually) would contradict Lemmy’s disability-inclusive culture. As well, email verification wouldn’t work for people who would prefer anonymity. And nefarious users could just use a spoof mail account, so the introduction of required email account verification would really only harm privacy-focused real users, and do nothing to prevent trolls. Also, while on the subject and though you didn’t mention it, we don’t ban IPs because some VPNs reuse them for multiple people. So banning the IP of a troll might also cause the ban of real users.

      • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOPM
        2·
        3 years ago

        These are my thoughts on email too. Using throwaways is so easy for trolls, and legitimate users now have a privacy concern since a lot of the “legitimate” email services are really invasive.

  • LunaticHacker@lemmy.ml
    1·
    3 years ago

    Hopefully this should be enough to prevent coordinated attacks , I will gladly assist with moderation in the IST timezone if things get worse

  • Mossy@lemmy.ml
    1·
    3 years ago

    I downvoted and reported as many posts as I can, I don’t know how much that helped but it was good to check back a couple hours later and see that the trolls’ posts had been removed

  • Lionel C-R@lemmy.coupou.fr
    1·
    3 years ago

    Also,it would be nice to have some sort of moderation/ban federation to avoid having to do the work on each instance.

    I’m sure it’s easier said than done but would be very beneficial to the project and community.

    • seahorse@lemmy.ml
      3·
      3 years ago

      I second this. If someone/something is banned and removed from an instance it shouldn’t still be visible on a linked instance. If this isn’t already a pending feature request I’ll happily make one for it.