• protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      What coup? Yanukovich was removed by the democratically-elected Ukrainian Parliament in a floor vote after he fled the country. Ukrainians are the ones who did all of this. What do you think the US did? I know what Russia did, starting here:

      The protests were sparked by President Viktor Yanukovych’s sudden decision not to sign the European Union–Ukraine Association Agreement, instead choosing closer ties to Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union. Ukraine’s parliament had overwhelmingly approved of finalizing the Agreement with the EU, but Russia had put pressure on Ukraine to reject it.

            • PolandIsAStateOfMind
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They cannot admit maidan was an US coup because their entire narrative of the war hinges on this.

            • 201dberg
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              They would get reprimanded by their superior officer for admitting it. They probably have a list on their cubicle wall of what they are and are not allowed to say.

          • ComradeSalad
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The Nuland call where they discuss who their pick for the leader of Ukraine is, and the operations they are undertaking to put them into power.

            You’re a fucking moron. Willingly ignorant, or purposefully cruel. 5 minutes of research could answer your question.

      • rjs001
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          The choice Yanukovich made was in direct contradiction with what the democratically-elected Ukrainian Parliament had been “overwhelmingly” working toward. You think Yanukovich unilaterally scrapping that work, ignoring the will of the Ukrainian people, and reorienting toward Russia was beneficial, so how was it beneficial?

      • redtea
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        but Russia had put pressure on Ukraine to reject it.

        I can’t go into a Pizza Hut without being upsold garlic bread. Of course Russia pressured Ukraine to accept deals in it’s favour.

        Do you think Russia was the only one putting pressure on Ukraine to sign an agreement? Forget about all the rest of it for a minute: do you really think the US and EU abstain from making any attempts to ‘encourage’ others to sign their agreements?

        The NATO alliance turned prosperous Libya to rubble for the mere suggestion that it would start trading in is own currency.

        (PS Don’t worry everyone, I don’t really go to pizza hut! The local pizza place has compromising photos of me and the one that pizza hut has of me shitting on a certain famous portrait just doesn’t scare me as much. Release it, I tell them, you can’t scare me into buying a salad bowl.)