• UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          5 months ago

          Reminds me of my friend who’s getting a business degree showing me some of her lectures. Dunno the English terminology for it but it was something along the lines of “Customers will spend a certain percentage of their income on different needs/desires (food, rent, leisure etc) that scales linearly with their income”, down to assigning percentages to individual food items.

          It took me like 30 seconds before I realized how completely insane and obvious nonsense that statement was. Someone who makes 500k a year obviously doesn’t spend 10x as much on eggs as someone who makes 50k. The sheer ideology in these presentation slides was genuinely shocking. Complete lunacy.

          tl;dr business majors aren’t people.

          • redtea
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            5 months ago

            Wasn’t there a twitter thing with rich people budgeting for like gallons and gallons of milk for every day and wondering why they weren’t any better off after a pay rise? If you’re going to get a job charging commission to people who didn’t need intelligence to earn their wealth, maybe this business degree lark has it’s uses.

            • Juice [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              If you want to learn bourgeois economics, become conservative. If you want to understand bourgeois economics, read Marx. – Rogan Renald

            • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’ll never forget randomly picking a business law class as an elective in college and on the very first day of that the professor bragged about being a right wing talk radio host, stated that if anyone ever left the classroom for any reason during class they would immediately be dropped from the course, and went on an unhinged rant about how the Duke Lacrosse case was a Democrat conspiracy against white people.

              I dropped the class and took chemistry instead, where I got a professor who looked like a cross between Danny Devito and Wallace Shawn and who showed videos of him setting off crude bombs in the woods as part of his lessons on “exothermic reactions”.

          • wax_worm_futures [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I went by the farmers’ market the other day and a stall had duck eggs for $8-10 a dozen. Buying 36-packs from Walmart is maybe about $1 a dozen. I don’t see it going much lower than that, or higher than $20, though.

            For a while now I’ve been fairly convinced that everyday expenditures scale logarithmically with income. The increase is pretty smooth, and tapers off pretty smoothly too.

  • Trudge [Comrade]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    5 months ago

    The reality’s even worse. Big Mac shrank in size compared to before.

  • Shaggy0291
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    5 months ago

    This argument that higher wages = higher prices was discredited at length by Karl Marx in his pamphlet Value, Price and Profit

    • edge [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      5 months ago

      Since we’re directly comparing the price of a product over time, aren’t we already taking inflation into account? Like this is a direct depiction of inflation and the fact that minimum wage hasn’t kept up.

      • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think Red_Sunshine is referring to both compared to the CPI. Since 1980 the CPI has risen 355%, while the minimum wage has risen 233% and the big mac has risen 1600%. So the price of a big mac has outpaced CPI by a factor of nearly 5 while wages have underpaced by factor 0.66.

        For visual learners:

        • edge [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Damn, I would have expected it to be something that stuck close to the average inflation of all consumer products (CPI, I guess). Like that graph would be completely expected if we were talking about housing, but not a burger.

          What’s a product that has stuck close to CPI?

          • redtea
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Does it show monopoly pricing, as well, maybe?

      • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah campbell tomato soup index is my favorite inflation measure. According to it, the dollar has lost 10x it’s value since 1971.

        but it doesn’t really factor in campbell becoming more greedy over time

  • idkmybffjoeysteel [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t understand how we got here. It just seems crazy now, how could things ever have been so cheap. Can we ever go back? I don’t know, it is like this or worse in every country I visit.

      • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I, too, love to generalize the reigning ideology, an artifact of an extremely recently developed system that has existed for only an incredibly brief period in human history as if it were something intrinsic to nature

        Human nature arguments boil down to the fact that the ruling ideology of society is shaped by the base economic relations. In other words, we perceive it as “natural” to work for monetary incentives because that’s pretty much the only choice we have right now. It seems “natural” that there should be hierarchy because we have them at our jobs, in our democracy, in the home thanks to patriarchal family relations, etc. Humans seem greedy “by nature” because without money, we starve or can’t pay for shelter, so it is in our interest to try to accumulate money in under the current economical setup. Capitalism literally compels capitalists to behave in a way that can be perceived as greedy, because if they don’t, their competitor will and then they will be gobbled up or put out of business. It’s the system that makes these things seem natural or essential.

        To attribute contemporary human behavior to “human nature” without looking at history and without considering the effects of the environment and social relations that necessarily shape human behavior is simplistic and unscientific, and it is usually an excuse made by the politically faint of heart or those who benefit from the current economic system.

  • CthulhusIntern [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The Big Mac is already so overpriced that I’d rather just order a burger from a pub. Even if it’s at a workday, I can just call/Doordash the pub and go pick it up in a few minutes. Let McDonald’s bring that price up and force them to do something interesting to remain profitable.

  • ComRed2 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    If we raise wages, we’re screwed. If we don’t raise wages, we’re screwed.

    Wow, it’s almost like this system is designed to screw you over no matter what.