Basically highlighting Abigail Shrier, JK rowling and transphobes and their role in the reversal of roe v wade
Removed by mod
I hope it’s irony because if not this is the stupidest thing I’ve read in a while given that those babies can’t survive outside their mother’s body, hence having absolutely zero autonomy on a basic material level
There needs to be a baby first. It would be more accurate to ask “What about the cellular autonomy of the leech inside of me”. Fuck you, abortion is healthcare.
wtf are you talking about?
It literally has no autonomy until it can survive outside the womb.
brb, keeping my tapeworm because i need to ask it’s consent before removing it
the baby either doesn’t exist nor has any autonomy
a baby should be a choice
Removed by mod
what if it ruins the existence of people who already do in fact have lives and relationships, things that could be permanently upended, and could result in the parent and child both having a miserable existence. In this capitalist world, we don’t have the framework that could properly care for these children and single parent families, so abortions is the best we have.
Look at it this way: the baby doesn’t exist yet as a person, and therefore by definition cannot have a preference for existence.
you can ask him after the woman gets free from the parasyte.
His existence? Can you really tell me this has so much independent will and thought it can be said to have gendered pronouns?
Aw mods were too fast, couldn’t get em with the old mouse fetus trick
deleted by creator
Is this a serious question? If not, this is a perfect situation for
/sdeleted by creator
