• Makan
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        I have. You’re confusing public policy with what they believe.

          • Shaggy0291
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            Nah mate. My fellow activist recently tried applying this line axiomatically with an organised mass of anti-vaxxer people. Even if you go to these people open handed the fact of the matter is communism has 200 years of baggage against it these days. We have to adapt Marxism to our modern conditions, we can’t treat something Marx wrote in 1848 as a catechism.

          • Makan
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            This is stupid and we’ve already gone against Marx in this respect. Every communist party since 1917 has done this.

              • Makan
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 years ago

                I have a friend in Red Fightback. Good for you. But it means nothing to me what one’s ideals are, but the circumstances. Since we’re at least a few decades away from revolution, then I don’t want to hear anymore belly-aching over electoralism just because it’s respectable to do so on the Interent.

                  • Makan
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    3 years ago

                    Oh!

                    Okay, I didn’t know about any TERFism.

                    Yeah, that’s a problem. Also, yes, I think I heard about the sexual assault thing and got confused with CPGB-ML.

                    Which, to be fair, ig, it’s easy to assume that CPGB-ML would be the first ones on the list of people who would gloss over that shit and probably enable it.