• Kind_Stone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 years ago

    They already have news titled “Russia wins the battle to lose a war” or something. They adapt to anything no problem, it’s their job

      • PorkrollPosadist
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 years ago

        Maybe they could make the argument that losing Mariupol was a tactical decision if it didn’t cost them 14,088 of their most ideologically committed fighters.

    • Muad'DibberA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      I would pay money to be in the white house briefing rooms where they’re telling Biden that its already a lost cause.

  • mauveOkra
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Nice touch to make “Ongoing” green so that it looks more balanced at a glance 🙄

  • Rafael_Luisi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 years ago

    The russian army is really damn impressive, in comparison to the inconpetent, spoiled, evil and undisciplined US army, the Russian one is basically the oposite.

    • ComradeChairmanKGB
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      Amazing what happens when a military is treated as a military rather than as a vehicle for extracting profits.

  • Leia_Round
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 years ago

    Siege of Mariupol can be upgraded to Russian Victory

  • based_s1gma
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 years ago

    With the amount of articles pushing the “might and power” of Ukrainian counterattacks, you would have expected more boxes in gold :)))

  • K4mpfie@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 years ago

    That’s like the spacerace. Individual victories don’t mean total win. To gauge the status of the war only on victories of battles leaves out so much other information like total attrition on gear and hr or area gained.