• RedCat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That might be the case. You seem to know more about Batman than I do so I will do as Mao suggests and shut up before I haven’t researched the topic.

    Any Batman comics you could recommend?

    • ComradeSalad
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is a can of worms about on par with a leftist asking “In what order should I read theory”? There a 1001 correct answers, and there is no exact timeline about how you can delve into the character.

      I have a decent bit of superhero knowledge and I dive into it every now and then, but I will not claim that I am some absolute authority on this subject and that I can give you a definitive list.

      I will however recommend “Batman: Year One” as it is a good place to start with the character and that is considered one of the best comics of all time.

      For a Batman/Joker story I would recommend the “Killing Joke” series, but I will say that is is fairly mature in its content, as it really attempts to delve into the Joker’s psychology as a tragic but evil character.

      The Batman stories in the “Flashpoint” Series is fun as a side story as it follows a world where the Flash makes one change and alters all of history, and Batman ends up being Thomas Wayne (the dad) rather then Bruce Wayne (the son), and this is a much more aggressive and violent Batman, with a pretty shady moral code as Thomas goes full capitalist and is pretty evil.

      The Long Halloween is also pretty good!

      • RedCat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you. Follow up question, where can I read them? DC Infinite isn’t available in my country (I also wouldn’t mind putting on a pirat hat)

      • Addfwyn
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not begrudging your interests, but I think this post kind of summarizes why I have never been able to read any western comics.

        I like really concrete beginning/end points for fictional media. I like to be able to say “This is book 1, I can start here. This is book 4, it’s the last one”. I also hate jumping into any series in the middle, even if it is absolutely designed for it. Anytime I have thought about trying to read any western comics (or warhammer on the same note) it just seems like a massive ambigious undertaking.

        • RedCat
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get that feeling when it comes to comics since their are a lot of reboots and stories in alternative universes and resets and stuff like this. I tried to get a better grip on Batman during the last days. The comics recommended where great but diving deeper has become very difficult since I just can’t figure out what is canon and what isn’t.

          Getting into Warhammer is a lot easier in my opinion (don’t get me wrong, it can still be daunting without proper guidance). Most Warhammer book series are contained in their own. You don’t need to know the entire universe to understand the Eisenhorn books or Gaunt’s Ghosts or Ciaphis Cain. Knowing more about the universe might give you a broader understanding but it’s not required to fully enjoy them at all. The biggest hurdle is deciding on where to start. There are a lot of good starting points. Picking your first novel is pretty much depending on what you like.

      • ComradeSalad
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “No investigation, no right to speak”.

        “Unless you have investigated a problem, you will be deprived of the right to speak on it. Isn’t that too harsh? Not in the least. When you have not probed into a problem, into the present facts and its past history, and know nothing of its essentials, whatever you say about it will undoubtedly be nonsense. Talking nonsense solves no problems, as everyone knows, so why is it unjust to deprive you of the right to speak? Quite a few comrades always keep their eyes shut and talk nonsense, and for a Communist that is disgraceful. How can a Communist keep his eyes shut and talk nonsense?”

        -Mao in Oppose Book Worship

        • Cyber GhostOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I totally agree with the sentiment, but when does one know that one knows enough though? How deep does one have to dig? How much does one have to research to be able to contribute?

          • DamarcusArt
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mao mentions the essentials of a topic. He isn’t saying “you must be an expert on something before you can talk about it” rather “You must understand it before you talk about it.”

            Someone who knows nothing about a topic cannot contribute to a discussion on it, but someone who knows at least a little still can. Look at the libs that wander in here sometimes, they are the perfect example of “talking nonsense” that Mao describes. They contribute nothing, because the things they say are said out of complete ignorance of the topic.

            Basically, you could sum it up as “Check yourself, before you wreck yourself.” Examine your own understanding of a topic to work out if you do actually know something about it, or if you are just spitting hot air. If you think you do, but others inform you that you don’t, that’s not a bad thing, it’s an opportunity for learning.