Paradox of tolerance… or paradox of intolerance? Point is appeasement doesn’t work and at the end of the day you have to be intolerant of the intolerant.
Like you don’t even understand where the Red Warriors (and other antifascists in France) even came from, you look like an absolute fool right now, bumbling around in the dark and hitting furniture every few steps, meanwhile people watch on you with their flashlights. That’s how you look.
Fascists used to (they still do, but they used to as well) co-opt everything. They started coming into punk shows which these bands of antifa activists used to go to, and started polluting them with their fascist crap. Then when people complained, the fascists would jump them.
There’s a documentary around where ex red warriors explain how they fought against fascists, they used to drive around Paris with baseball bats and other weapons and jump random people or antifascists. They wore jewellery that had edges to inflict damage on a punch. Some of them actually illegally carried guns on them.
I’m still talking about the fascists. What antifascists such as the red warriors did was to finally say enough is enough, we don’t want fascists making people scared to go to their shows and have fun, so they organised into their own gang and gave the fascists a taste of their own medicine. And it worked, fascists left the Parisian punk scene.
Removed by mod
And I suppose that the Allied soldiers were just the Wehrmacht but under a different flag too by your logic?
If Stalin just followed a debate class and invited Hitler for a heckin epic rap battle, he wouldn’t have had to send the Red Army in
I mean, Patton was in the Allies, and you know what he was like
While he’s fighting Nazis I couldn’t care less what he is like
Removed by mod
Clean Wehrmacht believer has entered the chat.
gtfo fucking fascist
Paradox of tolerance… or paradox of intolerance? Point is appeasement doesn’t work and at the end of the day you have to be intolerant of the intolerant.
Removed by mod
It is unfortunately a valid point. If one side is acting to physically harm you then politely asking them to stop is no longer sufficient.
Removed by mod
“former” war criminal, that explains it
Like you don’t even understand where the Red Warriors (and other antifascists in France) even came from, you look like an absolute fool right now, bumbling around in the dark and hitting furniture every few steps, meanwhile people watch on you with their flashlights. That’s how you look.
Fascists used to (they still do, but they used to as well) co-opt everything. They started coming into punk shows which these bands of antifa activists used to go to, and started polluting them with their fascist crap. Then when people complained, the fascists would jump them.
There’s a documentary around where ex red warriors explain how they fought against fascists, they used to drive around Paris with baseball bats and other weapons and jump random people or antifascists. They wore jewellery that had edges to inflict damage on a punch. Some of them actually illegally carried guns on them.
I’m still talking about the fascists. What antifascists such as the red warriors did was to finally say enough is enough, we don’t want fascists making people scared to go to their shows and have fun, so they organised into their own gang and gave the fascists a taste of their own medicine. And it worked, fascists left the Parisian punk scene.
🤓 🤓 🤓 🤓
Removed by mod
Which argument is that, and point me to an instance where brownshirts used that argument.
you don’t need an argument to beat someone up, just a weapon
By all means be my guest and debate the fascists and Nazis who want to eradicate entire races while I will try other ways to defend myself
the people that attacked fascists are the fascists themselves, i am very intelligent 🤓
🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
Yeah I also believe that fascists and antifascists are morally equivalent. I am very smart.
Lol this guy still looks at surface level politics like a noob