You probably know how this basically went.
So this guy was in class and he had a shirt of Karl Marx. I said “Based!” and told him that he should get a Lenin shirt next. He said that Lenin was authoritarian, so we argued about whether Lenin was good or not and whether “authoritarianism” was required to succeed in a socialist revolution. I even told him to read “On Authority” and he still didn’t agree with me.
Some gems:
-
“He (Engels) is saying that authoritarianism is required DURING the revolution, not after.” I tried to explain to him that such “authoritarianism” was also required to SECURE the proletarian state after the initial violent revolution, but apparently that went over his head.
-
“You’re not a leftist, you’re far-right. You just use leftist rhetoric. You’re just like Nazis.” The classic red fash tankie line.
-
“Killing fascists is bad because killing people for their different political beliefs is always bad. You are basically doing genocide.” He literally (if I recall) said that violence is required in a socialist revolution but all of a sudden if we do violence against fascists, which are harsh enemies of workers, that’s bad and us letting them off the hook totally isn’t going to lead to them becoming stronger. He said Lenin was bad because he “murdered political opponents.” (I assume he is referring to the Red Terror.)
-
“Wouldn’t all the killing done in a Leninist nation cause similar destabilization as when the USA does imperialism such as in Iraq?” I have yet to see such destabilization in socialist nations, only exceptions being in Cambodia and when the Warsaw Pact nations fell to capitalism.
-
“You aren’t fighting the bourgeoisie, you are fighting the workers.”
-
I defined fascism as socialists define it: an open terroristic capitalist dictatorship in response to workers’ movement. Therefore, former AES nations and not even the current USA (yet) can be considered fascist. But he said “You’re just playing the definition game” or something like that.
This young man is very intelligent, I’ve got to admit. I can only hope he shares his wisdom with the socialists of the third world, to tell them why the evil Leninist line is just far-right and that they need to embrace his enlightened version of Marxism in order to succeed.
That’s ok. If they’re middle class, they are arguing from a position which reflects their economic interests and so only poverty will wake them from their haze. If they are prol, then this is simply a matter of liberal tendencies of which we are all in the process of purging within ourselves. It’s a process we all go through.
The honeymoon phase of labor is amazing, it reminds us all that we are indeed productive beings. It’s a part of the position of being new to laboring to see the positives in it and not fully understand the negatives our class echoes day in and day out on say…antiwork for example. This comes in time and experience of being exploited, screwed over, used, lied to, manipulated, and abused by the bourgeois class. This process also demonstrates that it is not our nature to hate labor or to see labor as a negative experience, it is the conditions of capitalism and the bourgeoisie who make us see things this way. I believe part of being a Marxist is helping to remind people that labor doesn’t have to be misery, it’s the current conditions which have “taught” our class this.
I would say enjoy this time and expect the various negative aspects to come as those are the conditions for now.
Having started a new job as a cashier I’ve been thinking about this pretty heavily, the intrinsic value of labor itself - problem, solution, problem, solution. It can be like a fun little puzzle if you allow it to be.
I went into working age already completely disillusioned with this country and the concept of labor entirely, so it’s an… interesting experience attempting to resolve my own internal contradictions regarding how I feel about working at all. Also disabled and wish I could focus on creative work instead of… “thank you for shopping with Brand, have a nice evening” for 8 hours to completely ungrateful assholes. (Most people are nice, tbf.)
Labor that directly benefits us and our loved ones is always worthwhile - this is a mantra I have been repeating to myself to encourage myself to continue to do chores and go to work. Of course, when I go to work, I’m only benefiting myself and my loved ones because I’m making money, a substantial amount of which is being siphoned off of my and all my coworker’s paychecks. So it’s difficult to stay focused and keep wanting to work, you know? This shit can be miserable. Main drivers right now are 1. not starving to death and 2. my workplace is technically unionized so I’m hoping to find a way to get involved (…infiltrate, hehehe) there - and the best union organizers are those invested in their coworkers and their labor.
Real Stakhanovite hours from me recently, except my hard work and upbeat attitude are benefiting billionaires first and foremost instead of the socialist cause… just excellent.