minus-square@roastpotatothief@lemmy.mllinkfedilink-5•2 years agoWhy should we believe the second assertion over the first one? IMO to contradict someone, you need a stronger argument, like more credible details or a reference.
minus-square@Samubailink18•2 years agoYou got it backwards. Extraordinary assertions demand extraordinary evidence.
minus-square@Munrocklink16•edit-22 years ago There is loads more in the thread, and a link to his telegram channel where there’s even more.
minus-square@roastpotatothief@lemmy.mllinkfedilink-6•2 years agoOh right, the supporting info is all there really. What’s the link?
minus-squareMuad'DibberAlink12•2 years agoIf info worked like that, then anyone could say any unsourced thing and you would immediately believe it, until someone else did the work to debunk it.
Why should we believe the second assertion over the first one?
IMO to contradict someone, you need a stronger argument, like more credible details or a reference.
You got it backwards. Extraordinary assertions demand extraordinary evidence.
There is loads more in the thread, and a link to his telegram channel where there’s even more.
Oh right, the supporting info is all there really. What’s the link?
If info worked like that, then anyone could say any unsourced thing and you would immediately believe it, until someone else did the work to debunk it.