Wait, it’s ACTUALLY FILMED IN SPACE?
Yes. It was a whole thing. Peresild was sent to ISS (with big pomp, and some scandals about her taking the place of an actual trained cosmonaut), and they filmed it there. As far as PR stunts go, this one’s alright (if expensive for the taxpayer)
(if expensive for the taxpayer)
Reminds me of a conversation I had with a basically apolitical friend some years ago:
Friend: “Man, going to the moon was such an awesome American moment. I wish we could do that again.”
Me: “Yeah, though there are about two million other things we could be spending that money on…”
Friend: “I get you, but our government’s going to waste the money anyway, and I’d rather they’d pour it into a hole on the moon than use it to kill people in Iraq.”
To which I had really nothing to say.
They need to read Sakai’s Settlers.
They couldn’t have picked a better day to premier a movie like that.
How so?
4/20 is the reefer holiday and a movie in space would mix well with the day’s usual celebrations.
Ya know, I’d prefer space movies to be about celebration of space advancements and what we as a species can achieve if we stop wasting our efforts on junk. Instead of, ya know, funni pothead number
True. Force of habit. The movie isn’t being made by burgerland, so it probably will be something actually substantial.
Eh, I wouldn’t count on it. It’s a movie from post-soviet, capitalist Russia. We’ve already seen some questionable attempts with “Age of Pioneers” and fuckin “Viking”. But we’ll see
@ArtBot@lemmygrad.ml Astronauts watch a movie about boxing kangaroos in a movie theater in outer space.
Here are images for the prompt: Astronauts watch a movie about boxing kangaroos in a movie theater in outer space.
These are some weird looking astronauts.
They might not have used CGI, but how much can we trust the use of cameras in space? After all, from up there, the earth looks like a sphere!
