Regulators shut down Signature Bank after its shares plunged in the wake of Silicon Valley Bank’s failure

New York-based Signature Bank was shut down by US regulators on Sunday, becoming the third failure in the country’s banking industry in less than a week.

According to a joint statement from the Federal Reserve, US Treasury and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the lender “was closed by its state chartering authority.”

The statement from the regulators was issued to announce a new emergency program to protect depositors of failing banks. They explained that they would make a “systemic risk exception” for both Signature and Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), a tech and start-up focused lender that was shut down following a bank run last week, allowing the clients of both banks to have full access to their deposits.

“[SVB] depositors will have access to all of their money starting Monday, March 13… We are announcing a similar systemic risk exception for Signature Bank… all depositors of this institution will be made whole. As with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank, no losses will be borne by the taxpayer,” the regulators said, adding that they would use the FDIC’s deposit insurance fund to fully protect all depositors, both insured and uninsured.

Signature was a big lender to the crypto industry. As of December 31, it had $110.4 billion in total assets and $88.6 billion in total deposits, according to a securities filing. New York state officials said the move to close the bank was made “in light of market events” in a bid to protect bank clients and the financial system. In the wake of SVB’s collapse last week, Signature also saw its shares plunge following deposits outflows.

The collapse of Signature is the third significant failure in the US banking industry within the past week. California-based, crypto-focused Silvergate was the first to announce its impending liquidation last Wednesday, followed by the SVB implosion on Friday – the largest US bank collapse since the financial crisis of 2008. Bank failures sparked concerns over the health of the entire US banking system, with many other lenders seeing their stocks plunge.

  • @big_spoon
    link
    141 year ago

    so this how it looks when capitalism fails…

  • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
    link
    13
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    USA is already baling them out, which leads to following immediate observations:

    1. They know a huge shit is flying straight into the fan and are trying to stop it before it hits. Or:
    2. They just reflexively throw money at the financiere because this is what they are there for
    3. Most likely both
    4. Compare to their reaction when East Palestine was send to chemical hell.
    • loathesome dongeater
      link
      61 year ago

      It’s most likely to prevent a domino effect. If they don’t do anything, more people will withdraw out of panic causing more of what caused SVB to implode.

      • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
        link
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah i think so too, even if those were really isolated cases (which i don’t believe) the fact of entire financiere system being basically one huge debt bubble means it can implode into huge crisis anyway on a moment notice for any reason.

  • @supersolid_snake
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    Why were banks crypto focused? Of course it would collapse.

    • @OrnluWolfjarl
      link
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because certain billionaires who owned these banks, were trying for years to prop up cryptos, using their customer’s money. SVB (the first one) was keeping 5 dollars out of every 1000 in accounts, and used the rest for venture capitalism and cryptos. And their venture capitalism was aimed at mostly “start-ups” that were all about crypto. I imagine something similar is going on here.

      By the way, it’s very likely that the regulators are opening up the depositor accounts, because the depositors are other millionaires and billionaires.

      • @supersolid_snake
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        Thanks for the explanation. It’s insane how risky banks are allowed to be especially considering a lot of businesses had their payrolls deposited there.