• SovereignState
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    Although unnecessary to our understanding of the USSR’s great achievements, I still wish we could know what Marx would have thought or wrote about the Soviet Union.

    • ComradeSalad
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      “Holy shit the madlads actually did it! I was sure it was going to be either the German, French, or English proletariat first!”

      • Nimux
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        No, he wouldn’t have expected anything from the English. “Further study has now convinced me that the English working class will never achieve anything.”

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          But he did, even more than form the others. Remember that in his time capitalism did not yet achieved the imperialism stage, and he wrote that english society and government are the least militarized and least bureocratized (he meant britain itself, not the colonies) and the country had most developed proletariat, it could maybe be even possible to do a peaceful revolution.

          Of course, he was wrong, from lack of experience. Lenin later commented on that when writing abut how revolution happened not in the most developled capitalist countries in Europe, but in the least developed one, and recognized the reason as bourgeoisie bribing part of workers and creating labour aristocracy which together with inteligentsia then break the workers movement with opportunism. Which occured the earliest and strongest exactly in England.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        In Polish it’s Karol, and the feminine version is Karolina, both names are still popular.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s because pronounciation and grammar. In polish C is always something like english TS, so there is only one K. And in polish pronouncing KaRL, that RL part is hard, so O appeared (the same happened in all other slavic, ugric and romance languages). The source for name is the same old germanic “Karl” for “man, warrior”.

            The same btw happened to english, but only feminine version was softened like that, thus Carol.