Shalom my dear and beloved comrades ❤️ great work on banning this individual again . 😆👍🏼🤝🏼 Does he doesn’t have any other thing to do in life like something good for himself, instead of trying to have his stupid revenge against this great and beautiful community ?
I’m curious how the admins figured them out this time. Usually they’ll play their hand and be all like “hey look what rational wiki just said about lemmygrad” or “look what Wisconscom just wrote about us on their substack”, but I didn’t see any of the normal tells on that user.
A user on prolewiki told us this account contacted them out of the blue on lemmygrad to plead in defense of wisconcom.
We have our ways haha
Lol
One of his posts linked to a Hoxhaist website; maybe that’s how they know.
I’m guessing you mean Red Phoenix news? I didn’t take much of a look at the site, but I had never heard of the party that was running out before.
The American Party of Labor is a dedicated anti-revisionist party, opposed to concessions to capitalists, and critical of all imperialist actions by the US, Russia, and China.
Yup, they’re Hoxhaists alright.
me three
When and why was the original wisconcom banned?
deleted by creator
Best part is he (assumed American based on username) was arguing with and acting like he knew China better than an actual PRC citizen living there lol.
That army of alts is a testament to how… successful his whole movement is…
What sort of argument is this? Enough with the appeal to popularity fallacies. Facts are not based on what nationality or ethnicity you are, but on objective economic and material conditions, and to suggest otherwise is to be a crypto-Fascist.
My (and most of the Socialist movement) conclusion regarding the economic mode of production of China and other countries is based on objective facts which are available to me. Be it in the form of economic data and such. I don’t have to be of a particular nationality to understand that an specific economy has most of its economy under private control, has the profit motive in place, is imperialist (by the Marxist definition), and so on. By your chauvinistic reasoning, every single country on Earth, including the United States and other similar countries, cannot be criticised because “YOU aren’t from there”.
I am free to conclude what economic system a country is based upon the objective information I receive, that is a foundational aspect of Marxism. I care largely on the development of a revolutionary movement in my own country, and that requires a struggle against revisionism in my local Communist movement as well. If you want to defend a government and its policies, argue with actual facts, and not logical fallacies.
I don’t have to be of a particular nationality to understand that an specific economy has most of its economy under private control, has the profit motive in place, is imperialist (by the Marxist definition)
Based on your so-called “Marxist definition”, the New Economic Policy under Lenin would be imperialist
[…] In particular, a free market and capitalism, both subject to state control, are now being permitted and are developing; on the other hand, the socialized state enterprises are being put on what is called a profit basis, i. e., they are being reorganized on commercial lines, […] Role and functions of the trade unions under the New Economic Policy, 1922
Besides, most of the Chinese economy is not under private control. They are subject to very strict regulations, and the share of GDP between the private and state sector in the major of provinces of China is close to 50-50. The majority of Chinese enterprises in the Forbes Top 100 are state-owned. The state enterprises are not all moved by profit, and the major strategic companies of the country, such as mining, electrical grid, military, communication, financial, petroleum and gas, are all state owned.
And even “private” enterprises in China are different. They are under strict regulation and even direction of the Communist Party of China. The CPC has political influence over the major corporations, and their direction influence only increases, e.g., by buying shares, or by organizing party branches inside private enteprises, among other tactics
lmao I knew this was a wisconcom alt the moment I approved it. Too bad I didn’t capture it at the time for posterity, you’ll just have to believe me.
deleted by creator
You make a good point about standpoint epistemology.
But if someone from within China bases an argument on information that is unavailable outside of China or in English?
(Caveat: I’m unsure of the details of the original debate.)
Edit: typo
The only main point I can recall off the top of my head without digging for old posts is the Chinese user said that Hoxha started calling Mao a revisionist when China stopped sending Albania money.
That does ring a bell now, actually.
Full thread for reference lol
Another old thread too
deleted by creator
Enti khanzir !!! ( You pig )
Nice to see you again mate lol, this must be a new record
Sounds like dogmatism getting the better of him.
