it’s technically not a battle when only one side is allowed to use weaponsI mean the reason tear gas isn’t supposed to be used in war is because it might be mistaken for more lethal gas and trigger escalation. Somehow I don’t think protestors have the ability to launch sarin gas shells at the cops.
Would be cool if they did, theoretically speaking.
Somehow I don’t think protestors have the ability to launch sarin gas shells at the cops.
Not with that attitude!
Weren’t there reports (from Ukrainian media) that AFU is using actual chemical weapons? Dropping them from drones
The AFU also published live feeds of themselves dropping bombs on surrendering russian soldiers waving the white flag and injured soldiers waving the white flag. Reddit orgasm’d itself to nirvana watching it.
making sure your enemy doesnt want to surrender because you will kill them horrifically has never backfired in the history of warfare, trust me im a red#itor
Especially against Russia.
I’m reminded of that one hero who got captured by the nazis in Stalingrad and lied to them that the machine gun nest didnt have any ammo left, causing the deaths of a whole bunch of nazis
they hung him after, but at that point all of us would be like “Cope, lmao.”
yup, but that’s ok because the west is on their side
When one is a servant to the US, it’s all “legal”.
Is This American Exceptionalism ?
100% necessary highlight
