☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to Death to NATOEnglish · 5 months agoNYT is now openly talking about a peace deal in which Ukraine would have to remain neutral and give up territorywww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1107arrow-down12
arrow-up1105arrow-down1external-linkNYT is now openly talking about a peace deal in which Ukraine would have to remain neutral and give up territorywww.nytimes.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to Death to NATOEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square48fedilink
minus-squareShrike502linkfedilinkarrow-up34·5 months agoTbf I suspect their definition of “neutral” is different from yours or mine. Sweden was “neutral”. Finland was “neutral”. Switzerland, Austria, many of the offshores, I’m sure. What did it mean in practice? Diddly squat.
minus-squarelortylinkfedilinkarrow-up25·5 months agoConsidering how the ukrainian regime wiped their ass off with previous deals, I’m not sure Russia is willing to believe in a “neutral ukraine”.
minus-squareredtealinkfedilinkarrow-up16·5 months agoCertainly not to give Ukraine the time to restock and start again.
Tbf I suspect their definition of “neutral” is different from yours or mine. Sweden was “neutral”. Finland was “neutral”. Switzerland, Austria, many of the offshores, I’m sure. What did it mean in practice? Diddly squat.
Considering how the ukrainian regime wiped their ass off with previous deals, I’m not sure Russia is willing to believe in a “neutral ukraine”.
Certainly not to give Ukraine the time to restock and start again.