God I wish this was true. Putin won’t even allow Syria to use the s300s that are already there. For all the noise about him being a belligerent psychopath, he probably still pines to join the west.
This is why I’ve always found the whole hoping for a regime change in Russia so hilarious. Putin is basically a moderate in Russian politics, and it’s pretty much guaranteed that whoever replaces him is going to be a lot more hardline towards the west. If they think Putin is difficult, just wait till they have to deal with somebody like Kadyrov.
deleted by creator
Oh yeah, I don’t think Kadyrov himself is a likely candidate, I’m saying somebody with a similar mindset could easily get in power.
deleted by creator
If Putin runs, I can’t see how he doesn’t get another term.
deleted by creator
Honestly don’t know the actual logic was there. Stalin did do a lot of questionable shit after the war though like abandoning Greece, which led to his falling out with Tito and breakdown of relations with Yugoslavia. Seems like he was really keen on honoring whatever deals he mad with the west at the end of the war for whatever reason.
I’ve read somewhere that the USSR supported the zionist entity because they felt it was a form of decolonisation, ending the British occupation is Palestine. Also, back then zionism had some superficially leftist tendencies and there was a widespread belief on the left that the zionist entity would become a “socialist” society.
It was not the greatest moment for the analytical power of marxism-leninism. The communist movement failed the Palestinians.
I think a Medvedev 2.0 presidency would be even more hardline. Kadyrov is actually kind of a softie.
Its the usual reducto ad hitlerum, the west does this to every leader that does not bend the knee.
Literally everyone has been compared to hitler, it is comical at this point.
Everyone except, you know, the Zionists regime that is currently following the Hitler playbook to the letter.
it only works for enemies of the us
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Pretty much every claim the west makes about Putin and Russian policy has no substance behind it. Yammering about Russia threatening to use nukes is another great example of this.
when ur thinking is global
never heard it this way. It’s always ‘if Putin wins in Ukraine, he’ll attack other non NATO countries (like Moldova). If Ukraine wins, Putin will stop trying to achieve his goals with war since he can’t win.’
Slightly more reasonable take and less of the straw man in the twitter screenshot.
I’ve heard countless times that he’ll attack Poland or some shit, I don’t think it’s a strawman.
I’ve heard that the Baltics are next.
I’m not from burgerland so probably that’s why I’ve never heard this insane take
There are lots of articles saying Russia would attack countries like Poland next, here’s an example https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20230211-we-will-be-in-danger-if-russia-wins-security-concerns-drive-poland-s-support-for-ukraine
Just earlier today, I saw chuds from my country (Scandinavian NATO country) arguing that we should ignore what’s happening in Palestine as it “doesn’t concern us” while the Ukraine war should get more attention, because “Putin is an actual existential threat to us”. Fucking nuts, but the propaganda this last two years has been strong.
Going by the logic of the post, If Putin is scared of attacking NATO countries why would he do so after winning Ukraine? So he’s both afraid and unafraid of NATO? I don’t get it.
There’s no actual logic at play here. It’s a narrative specifically crafted for people with brains as smooth as bowling balls.
