IMO it is stupid to think “Maoism” is something different to Leninism. Leninism is Marx’s theory applied into practice, and as they said, this changes accordingly depending on the material and social context of the reality where it is being carried out. Mao did not do anything that couldn’t be classified as Leninism, if anything I said one could speak about Dengism or SwCC as being something different, but in the end they are also Leninism but applied after a lot of years where Marxists studies where able to bloom. I don’t know which communist Peruvian party they refer to, but if they mean Sendero Luminoso, then they are completely blinded, since they were shit.

I honestly don’t have anything so monstrous against people who identify as Maoists, and by any means if they achieve any meaningful impact and they can sustain it, it’s better than capitalism, but if you can’t understand something so simple as this, you’re bound to commit a lot more mistakes. Also these people is the one who accuse us of revisionism while they basically deny any modern communist State as such, what happened is not that we did revisionism, but only Marxist thought grew stronger, and the tactics changed.