• Adlach
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t suppose anyone has a non-State Department source on what did happen at Katyn?

    • ComradeSalad
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Germans committed a mass killing of Polish officers in 1941, and everyone completely forgot.

      Then in 1944 when the Germans were in full retreat, Geobbels and the german propaganda wing magically found a mass killing zone that the “Soviets” had committed 3 years prior in order to try and radicalize the Poles into helping them fight the Soviets.

      Literally the only source that the Soviets committed Katyn come from the Nazis.

      • Adlach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Didn’t the USSR confirm its involvement in 1990? And the Russian Federation right after that in 1991?

        • ComradeSalad
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          With some bizarre claims, such as one NKVD officer executing 7,000 prisoners all by himself, or that the 0.25 APC German made Luger bullets and guns used were used because sustained firing of soviet guns were uncomfortable for the executioners.

          Or that the NKVD officers planted evidence to coverup and implicate the Germans as being behind the massacre in 1941.

          In the immediate aftermath, the UK and US governments also dismissed the claims as bogus which was later handwaved away by being attributed to “Soviet spy interference”, which is an interesting conclusion.

          • CriticalResist8A
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I really have to wonder how the USSR could have obtained German guns and ammunition (their guns did not use the same caliber) to commit this massacre with in 1940-1941 of all years. This is original research of sorts, I’ve never seen anyone else look at the calibre and the availability of these weapons to the Soviets. If the massacre happened after Operation Barbarossa then they probably captured weapons and ammo, but it still made no sense to use foreign weapons for this since Gorbachev and Yeltsin produced “documents” signed by Stalin and Beria that pinned the massacre on them. Like you said, the only reason they would have ever used German weapons, in light of these revelations, is for something silly like handling comfort.

            • ComradeSalad
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Exactly, the guns are handwaved away as being supplied by Moscow, but the simple question remains… how? Where would the NKVD have gotten nearly enough of an uncommon, WW1 Walter pocket pistol from 1915, and its extremely unique ammunition? If they had captured guns, they probably would have been the Model 5 and Model 7, where did they get such outdated guns from?

              0.25 APC is a 6mm round, and the Walther Model 2 is a tiny gun. That feels like the most uncomfortable, and unpleasant way you could execute someone. You would essentially have to be point blank to the head for a 6mm to do anything if you didn’t want to have to shoot the person 25 times.

              This is the gun we are talking about.

            • Franfran2424
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              USSR trained german units during pre-nazi period, pre-1933. 1925 Lugers could also have been purchased during trade exchanges with german-nazi government, to test weapons, but there is no record of such a thing, afaik. They were comercially available pre-1939 probably, maybe during that period they could be bought by private owners and requisitioned in record time for some big conspiracy (unlikely).

              Ultimately none of this makes sense, since the ammunition was 98.7% german made bullets from 1941. It was ammo that soviets couldnt get.

              • CriticalResist8A
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Exactly, the more you look at the official narrative, the less sense it makes. Releasing documents supposedly signed by Stalin (which got “transferred” translated to “liquidated”, as in prisoner transfers) was something they must have thought made sense at the time and would have been a smoking gun, but ultimately it just unravelled the entire thread.

                • ComradeSalad
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Also the documents aren’t even “signed” by Stalin, it’s letters from Beria asking what they should do with the Poles who then gives a few suggestions. There’s no smoking gun of Beria saying “Yes sir, I will now execute all the poles”.

    • CriticalResist8A
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have some evidence here: https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre

      It’s difficult to investigate because the site was closed by Polish authorities just as the evidence started pointing the other way, and most people who went to investigate basically ended up saying “the Soviets totally did it guys”. Let’s be honest, the evidence to show it wasn’t a Soviet massacre is circumstantial, but there’s enough of it to start pointing the finger at the Nazis. There’s a few smoking guns, it’s all in the page

        • Franfran2424
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean read the references. 98.67% of the bullets are german from 1941 (year of the massacre), 2 bullets are soviet bullets of 1930s type.

          The killed were arranged in the same way as with other nazi massacres (how would NKVD know how nazis arranged the dead?), the killed included many children (soviets almost never killed children) and were likely jewish…

          It is clearly a nazi massacre covered up to be soviet made.

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            I feel like even a coverup would have taken more effort, such a low proportion of soviet bullets to me says that they were likely just doing a regular massacre and a couple guys were using soviet weapons, presumably to replace lost or broken ones

            • ComradeSalad
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because it wasn’t designed to be blamed on the Soviets. The Germans just repurposed the massacre when it was obvious they were about to lose that region of Poland, so they could blame the Soviets and drive war propaganda.

              It wasn’t a bad coverup because there was no coverup, it was just a Nazi massacre that just so happened to be dug up and repurposed by Goebbels.

          • ∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/its]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok. So I’m 100% sure that the people in Volodymyr-Volyns’kiy were killed in 1941, the Ukranian report states that. Furthermore a Polish police badge bearing the numbers “1099” was found in (and this is important because another, 1441, was found ~5m away from it) the grave. 1099 seemingly belongs to Ludwik Małowiejski, who, based on the transfer lists, was presumed dead in Tver/Kalinin and so buried Mednoe.