• CriticalResist8A
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I really have to wonder how the USSR could have obtained German guns and ammunition (their guns did not use the same caliber) to commit this massacre with in 1940-1941 of all years. This is original research of sorts, I’ve never seen anyone else look at the calibre and the availability of these weapons to the Soviets. If the massacre happened after Operation Barbarossa then they probably captured weapons and ammo, but it still made no sense to use foreign weapons for this since Gorbachev and Yeltsin produced “documents” signed by Stalin and Beria that pinned the massacre on them. Like you said, the only reason they would have ever used German weapons, in light of these revelations, is for something silly like handling comfort.

    • ComradeSalad
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Exactly, the guns are handwaved away as being supplied by Moscow, but the simple question remains… how? Where would the NKVD have gotten nearly enough of an uncommon, WW1 Walter pocket pistol from 1915, and its extremely unique ammunition? If they had captured guns, they probably would have been the Model 5 and Model 7, where did they get such outdated guns from?

      0.25 APC is a 6mm round, and the Walther Model 2 is a tiny gun. That feels like the most uncomfortable, and unpleasant way you could execute someone. You would essentially have to be point blank to the head for a 6mm to do anything if you didn’t want to have to shoot the person 25 times.

      This is the gun we are talking about.

    • Franfran2424
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      USSR trained german units during pre-nazi period, pre-1933. 1925 Lugers could also have been purchased during trade exchanges with german-nazi government, to test weapons, but there is no record of such a thing, afaik. They were comercially available pre-1939 probably, maybe during that period they could be bought by private owners and requisitioned in record time for some big conspiracy (unlikely).

      Ultimately none of this makes sense, since the ammunition was 98.7% german made bullets from 1941. It was ammo that soviets couldnt get.

      • CriticalResist8A
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Exactly, the more you look at the official narrative, the less sense it makes. Releasing documents supposedly signed by Stalin (which got “transferred” translated to “liquidated”, as in prisoner transfers) was something they must have thought made sense at the time and would have been a smoking gun, but ultimately it just unravelled the entire thread.

        • ComradeSalad
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Also the documents aren’t even “signed” by Stalin, it’s letters from Beria asking what they should do with the Poles who then gives a few suggestions. There’s no smoking gun of Beria saying “Yes sir, I will now execute all the poles”.

          • CriticalResist8A
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You definitely seem to know more about this event than I do, would you be willing to edit the Katyn page on ProleWiki? You don’t necessarily have to request an account, you can write it up as a Word or Google Doc file and I can import it afterwards!

            • ComradeSalad
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I wouldn’t mind! It might take me a decent while, but I wouldn’t mind fact-checking, adding sources, and doing as best a write up as I can!

              Thank you for the offer!

              • CriticalResist8A
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                for the sources you will be able to add them right in the text btw as we use our custom references template and will likely have to copy them from your document and redo them in our format.