I have to say during Cultural revolution you could attack anyone and then many red guards would follow you. He mustnt to be capitalist or rightist. Many schools were destroyed for it’s teachers, names or histories. During Cultural revolution, the laws didnt work. Imaging you argued with your neighbour yesterday and now he is leading hundreds of red guards standing in front of your home.That was happening every day
I have to say during Cultural revolution you could attack anyone and then many red guards would follow you. He mustnt to be capitalist or rightist. Many schools were destroyed for it’s teachers, names or histories. During Cultural revolution, the laws didnt work. Imaging you argued with your neighbour yesterday and now he is leading hundreds of red guards standing in front of your home.That was happening every day
I’m assuming most of us are aware the cultural revolution as it occurred in China. But separating the GPCR from the hypothesis of Cultural Revolution in general, hasn’t history demonstrated that a Cultural Revolution/mass struggle against reaction in some shape or form will be necessary/inevitable as long as classes remain post-revolution?
Why should we not view the GPCR as a first attempt at Cultural Revolution, a theory that needs more exploration, rather than its failures being wholly indicative of how future attempts will go? Genuinely asking
He supports Cultural Revolution. I can say it’s not a good article just by this point
Yes, this is completely disqualifying.
why shouldn’t we support the cultural revolution?
I have to say during Cultural revolution you could attack anyone and then many red guards would follow you. He mustnt to be capitalist or rightist. Many schools were destroyed for it’s teachers, names or histories. During Cultural revolution, the laws didnt work. Imaging you argued with your neighbour yesterday and now he is leading hundreds of red guards standing in front of your home.That was happening every day
I would like an answer to this too.
I have to say during Cultural revolution you could attack anyone and then many red guards would follow you. He mustnt to be capitalist or rightist. Many schools were destroyed for it’s teachers, names or histories. During Cultural revolution, the laws didnt work. Imaging you argued with your neighbour yesterday and now he is leading hundreds of red guards standing in front of your home.That was happening every day
I’m assuming most of us are aware the cultural revolution as it occurred in China. But separating the GPCR from the hypothesis of Cultural Revolution in general, hasn’t history demonstrated that a Cultural Revolution/mass struggle against reaction in some shape or form will be necessary/inevitable as long as classes remain post-revolution?
Why should we not view the GPCR as a first attempt at Cultural Revolution, a theory that needs more exploration, rather than its failures being wholly indicative of how future attempts will go? Genuinely asking
You are right. I just focused on the absurd Cultural Revolution of the last century, and did not deny the possibility of the future