• DamarcusArt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I do disagree with the article somewhat. Though it is probably more splitting hairs than anything else.

    From my point of view it seems less that they want to believe it, and more that they aren’t given the tools to properly analyze it. They are given fiction as their “tool” for understanding the world, and when the propaganda resembles their fiction, they don’t question it because it matches their toolset.

    Of course, there’s still no excuse for not breaking out of that pattern and refusing to learn more. I agree with the article there. I’d say almost everyone here did at some point, even under awful circumstances where it would’ve been much easier to just “switch off” and remain content. Though intellectual laziness is one of the biggest virtues in the west.

    • Water Bowl Slime
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s true. Though being politically illiterate doesn’t explain why libs are so incurious, to the point of dismissing evidence before even looking at it. Their ignorance is willful to an extent because they know on some level that they benefit materially from playing along. Or if they don’t benefit, then they can at least avoid getting punished for rocking the boat.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I can’t ascribe much agency or self awareness to the us burgerosie. I’ll grant that most of them have normal human faculties but the ones i interact with are profoundly ignorant and incurious to the point where they might as well be ayerdales for all the intellectual function they utilize

      • DamarcusArt
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Burgerosie” is much more fun than “labour aristocracy.”