This is what ‘bestseller lists’ have done to reading.

  • DefectingToDPRK
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    Holy shit, the fact that Zero to One is on this is CRAZY. I actually unwittingly read that book after finishing high school, when I foolishly believed American tech was blazing a progressive path forward for society.

    That book is a techno-fascist manifesto. In it, Thiel flat out says society should be ran by tech CEOs acting as kings. He lays the groundwork for what Silicon Valley has been trying to do recently with Próspera in Honduras, the Trump plan for Gaza, and there’s been murmurings of a similar idea being pushed for Greenland.

    With his involvement in Palantir (among other things) I think there’s a real argument for this being comparable to a Mein Kampf.

  • ghost_of_faso3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    I just ran das kapital thru the wisdom density algo, it came out above 200%

  • Kultronx
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sapiens was one of the most annoying and vapid books I’ve ever read

    • invent_the_future
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      All the ‘A brief history of’ books are stupid, starting with their concept

      • Kultronx
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        mmm I did enjoy ‘a short history of nearly everything’ by bill bryson, i found its scientific info tying geology to our understanding of modern science rather interesting, without going into the harari’s zionist pro tyranny bs in the other book.

    • Manti.Inc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      The worst thing is he milked that series. He has so many spin offs, and he even made an illustrated version of it.

      • SaymazOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        They will be teaching this shit in school instead of actual peer reviewed studies!? 💀

  • Manti.Inc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    as someone who studied archaeology just be aware that sapiens is extremely sensationalist

  • 小莱卡
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Iirc sapiens is like a pitiful attempt at rediscovering historical materialism, anyways ill never bother reading it since its written by an israeli

  • bobs_guns
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    That there are no impenetrable bastards of books on here is a crime. Where is Ulysses. Where is Phenomenology of Spirit.

    • Manti.Inc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Hi there I studied archaeology and have read half of the book and critically reviewed it in a class. basically in the book he is trying to give a brief history of the earliest stages of humanity. His takes are very liberal, sensationalist and it doesn’t take he history of other parts of the world into account. He also tends to mix chronologies up a little, like its not written in a linear order which just further helps to confuse the reader. Also for people who study history, archaeology or anthropology it feels a bit hollow.

        • Manti.Inc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh, my bad I have read your question wrong.

          As for your question regarding the book by Jared Diamond “Guns, Germs, and Steel” I have not yet read it (Maybe I should). Jared Diamond was very briefly covered in my “human evolution minor” though so not sure if that helps but it should signal to you that he is definitely talked about in those circles.

          I have met Rutger Bregman though, the author of another book that covers similar things. He had a presentation/talk with the EU greens. So, he is more so libbed up though he at least admits that he writes in a very sensationalist way.

          Sadly, the professor that taught the lectures about reviewing and criticising certain historical/archaeological media has passed away in 2023, and with this I believe our faculty has lost the ability/channel to think critically about issues like that.